[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-users] xen_defconfig_x86_32 vs. xen0_defconfig_x86_32
- To: Grant Monroe <grant@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Anand <xen.mails@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 04:10:07 +0530
- Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:49:01 +0000
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Fy+OGGmYhs5i4VIvjUmpmNBfTUoh2gQa4NdVSo2U7YthZov9zj3ybyjWP+F2DCFdJ9NchpKALb23Qaf7ChWTA8Du3Z12VW68oiF18Lw0DeAQ5zWzGlghsqCdYMC9SE5cip16KTcJucidmSTPk5PboMmEa6egyHkjtks8rlHkhgM=
- List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
On 1/26/06, Grant Monroe <grant@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm looking at compiling a custom 2.6.12.6 linux kernel patched for
xen 3.0. I am slightly confused by the different default config files
in arch/xen/configs. It seems that I would base my dom0 kernel on the
xen0_defconfig_x86_32 file and my domU kernels on
xenU_defconfig_x86_32 file. What purpose does the xen_defconfig_x86_32
config file serve? What are the use cases?
That config is for the xen-kernel (please correct me if i am wrong). It has more drivers packed in it and the same kernel can be used for both dom0 and domU. It does take more time to compile it, however its mostly recommended since it packs in support for more hardware.
--
regards,
Anand
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
