[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-users] Re: cow implementation
- To: Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich@xxxxxxxxx>
- From: Anand <xen.mails@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 02:35:34 +0530
- Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:12:35 +0000
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=O8U+ySK4Y31DO3VAkjthTJJRzAugyEQKIs24eJjqcZ9j6Ssy0flzqf/YL61QebHLgX4Tb8o/5extVBY9F39zK8Q+svbQWYF0K89HE+3jdlZtWTh0d3byIhD6B6vw5tGi/IGm60rp38CcV7i/WzbAPT/Vc036eYK5smwLN2no6cc=
- List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
On 1/12/06, Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> And for the filesystem are you using flat images or volumes ?
A base volume shared between domU's and an image on top with per-domU files.
Going to drop the images and switch to volumes I think, since I don't
like the maximum of 8 virtual machines that this feature imposes. Too
bad, cause I did like the sparseness that the images allowed for ;-).
Can you explain this please ? base volume shared between domU's ? correct me if i am wrong but doesn't that imply a cow like system ?
--
regards,
Anand
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
