[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Xen alternatives


  • To: Mishin Dmitry <dim@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Pierre \"Le Pierrot\"" <cestpierre@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:16:45 +0000
  • Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ralph Passgang <ralph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:23:21 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=h/qyFgsn38yhz7J9y4CZUNNvCi47F2X6/lNgDKtU0tcfHtZmmt4mKdribDvOWRj23ACTabhcOXKrhNEx1m6SAG54U1JRsWHgXBpOBXfCkWdKjdqWJE7O/PK6y/RFzNxk0qi3KVjhYjdeoq2Lmlq0Nbzq5DLPoppBE4DGqHX0PBg=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

Alright,

Thank you all for sugestions so far. Qemu seems to work fine here, but
I am not that very happy with it and doesn't get me the same feeling
of a product that can be put to production servers. I talked to a
local vmware dealer and he provided me a CD with vmware esx and
virtual center and respective trial licenses. I am going to try it out
and see what comes out of this.

Is there any provision for xen to support windows natively without the
need of specific hardware?

Also, is there a way I can download the current snapshot from the
mercurial repository in a tarball? I am working on a closed network
segment that barely has internet connection and mercurial tools
support for proxy seem not to function as I'd like (or maybe it's my
profile that has little or no access in this proxy).

Cheers,
Pierre

On 1/10/06, Mishin Dmitry <dim@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > There is also an small open source version available for the linux
> > virtuozzo version (not for the windows version!). it was called open
> > virtuozzo, but if I rember it right they changed the name not long ago. I
> > think the project is just existing, because virtuozzo on linux is using
> > other open source software, so they had to release it for free. the
> > commercial virtuozzo versions just brings extra goodies like remote
> > managment via webinterface and so on to open virtuozzo.
> >
> > But I wouldn't use virtuozzo for linux myself, because it's more or less
> > the same as VServers and the open virtuozzo project has never been very
> > popular. VServers should be better supported and you will find a lot more
> > support if you have trouble.
> www.openvz.org
> It is not so small, as you think - it has all VServer features and more, such
> as network virtualization, netfilters, better resource management, fair
> scheduler and so on. It is more stable and convinient for end user - at
> least, we have such opinions in our forum. About better support - try both
> and compare.
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Dmitry.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.