[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Poor hard disk performance on xen-3/dom0


  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 20:23:32 +0100
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 19:29:38 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FFa9I2lmdiugO37Iza+IMssgPve3OqpEu8A8XaNLV37s1FDkOFP2ZAuyaKWRGcPiE4MYu7IwTU0RLRMtdW9O0lcDZTUGnRdDzrerB+yDG15dhRO2i68JKsfieqRO0cIh4/RbsQk6+15AwDdyjMF/vo9q/ZCBlKhO5+drGoqx5tM=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

Ian Pratt wrote:
> I know everyone always ignores me whenever I say this, but users really
> should be using the -xen kernel rather than -xen0/U.

Humn, maybe it's just me that's not ignoring you.  But the names xen
vs. xen0/U does not infer any obvious difference and I've never seen
the difference documented anywhere (although it probably is, who
knows).

> The latter two are
> just to make build times quicker for developers. The -xen kernel has way
> more drivers, though built as modules, so you'll need to make an initrd.

Maybe renaming them -xendevel0 and -xendevelU or some such would help?

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.