[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-users] Poor hard disk performance on xen-3/dom0
- To: Tim Freeman <tfreeman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Jayesh Salvi <jayeshsalvi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 14:33:36 -0600
- Cc: esj@xxxxxxxxxx, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 20:38:18 +0000
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=RNy38DUqK8RAIx9P83t5KNgaQviadD9oNoIFMPgu1xFrSPpGLKLU17K2im+n/umOR6BYRStzSTg/yZeuXdEDd1FiVMbwa1nXfrTBW79l70e43cMRmg+a8EQvk4snSCGC96xpbaqtOyG1Ot1V3zSss5S2Ex4aI5g0CLFp8bj0KMA=
- List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
Ok. In that case I see -xen is far bigger than -xen0/U
jayesh@sam:/lib/modules$ ls | xargs du -sh
44M 2.6.12.6-xen
1.2M 2.6.12.6-xen0
316K 2.6.12.6-xenU
62M 2.6.12-9-686
This doesn't however yet make me boot without initrd. But I will try some more things.
Thanks Tim for clarification.
Jayesh
On 12/31/05, Tim Freeman <tfreeman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:18:40 -0600
Jayesh Salvi <
jayeshsalvi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks Ian for the comment on -xen. But if -xen kernel has more drivers then
> why is the size of vmlinuz small for it?
I think because the bulk of the drivers are modules, so you should compare the
vmlinuz file + the appropriate /lib/modules/* directory.
Tim
--
Jayesh
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
