[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-users] VMWare and xen comparison


  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Shahzad Chohan <shahzad.chohan@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 10:46:01 +0000
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 10:43:10 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=mmGgSD2evk6c/RCVQmIl47vIpLu8Nr/BBqAnXX6fjW16R4qTO7aS+N3M99ELTTLRNAuTDI9zIHmLyeq6uN6w4ql3N5dXg/JPJf6kY1219Yf56T6vYRQWx+rDrAMCb3rXEoZ+2wKO/qNLO75yobYstdMDo0FMt05avj1TW5O9TLA=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

Hi

I need to consider the differences between vmware and xen. Basically any highlighted differences will be appreciated.

A few things come to mind, and I'd appreciate some thoughts on them.

1. Installation. Having tried to install xen hosts, I have found it to be difficult. The problem I find is that I have to reboot my server to install a new host as I can't install from cd without rebooting. Alternativly vmware allows me to install from cd a new hosts without the need to reboot the server and shutdown the other hosts. Yum installations are pain. What ways are there to get round this problem say in a redhat or fedora installation?

2. Performance. Although xen is technically superior to vmware on this level, practically I have read from other peoples emails that performance, such as network performance, really degrades under high loads. Just wondering if this is the case in xen 3.0 aswell?

Any other highlights will be apprecatied.

Thanks
Shahzad
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.