[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] relation between vcpu and domain
> what you've said basically is a discription of a design to comprise that a > VPU belongs to only one domain, but each domain can have several VPUs.. > Why should a VPU migrate? From that description I would assume that VPUs > don't migrate from domain.. but they (possibly) can be removed from a domain > has long has this stays with at least one VPU, and can be added to a domain, > if such vpu isn't assigned to a domain yet... Not the VPU, I was suggesting perhaps the domain migrates from one VCPU to another. > If that's true, there wouldn't be SMP for domains, since they are > assossiated with only one VPU. I thought SMP support for guests was still not functional. AFAIK, domains are still pinned to a single CPU. Am I wrong? It'll be great if someone with more authoritative knowledge can shed a light on this :) Diwaker -- Web/Blog/Gallery: http://floatingsun.net _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |