[Xen-devel] Re: RFC: xencomm in common

[Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:15:41 +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> [-- text/plain, encoding quoted-printable, charset: iso-8859-1, 34 lines --]
> 
> Le Lundi 21 Août 2006 11:41, Keir Fraser a écrit :
>> On 21/8/06 10:20 am, "Tristan Gingold" <Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> Fine in principle. Specific comments:
>> >>  * powerpc should be cleaned up at the same time to use the common
>> >> infrastructure. I don't want duplicated code hanging around in
>> >> arch/powerpc
>> >
>> > I have attached a blindly-made patch again powerpc files.
>> > If ppc people could check this, I'd be happy.
>> >
>> >>  * The code you add to common/ should obey the coding style of other
>> >> files in that directory
>> >>  * Arguably we should have an asm-generic for the xencomm guest-access
>> >> macros. That's a Linux-ism which I think fits well in this particular
>> >> case.
>> >
>> > Taken into account in this updated patch.
>>
>> Looks better. I assume you'll resend with signed-off-by when you want these
>> applied.
> Hi,
> 
> here are the signed-off-by patches for xen.
> I took the liberty to add Hollis Blanchard in signed-off-by of the first 
> patch 
> because he is the primary author of these files.

I suspect that CC is better than Signed-Off in this case.

-- 
Horms
  H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
  W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel