[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [XenPPC] [xenppc-unstable] [ppc] have xen_start_info_t using xen_ulong_t

To: xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:12:32 -0500
Delivery-date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:11:55 -0700
List-id: Xen PPC development <xen-ppc-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Remind me why we're using start_info instead of properties in the Open
Firmware device tree?

-- 
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center


_______________________________________________
Xen-ppc-devel mailing list
Xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [XenPPC] [xenppc-unstable] [ppc] have xen_start_info_t using xen_ulong_t
  - From: Jimi Xenidis

References:
- [XenPPC] [xenppc-unstable] [ppc] have xen_start_info_t using xen_ulong_t
  - From: Xen patchbot-xenppc-unstable

Prev by Date: Re: [XenPPC] Booting xen_maple_defconfig kernel on bare hardware
Next by Date: Re: [XenPPC] Booting xen_maple_defconfig kernel on bare hardware
Previous by thread: [XenPPC] [xenppc-unstable] [ppc] have xen_start_info_t using xen_ulong_t
Next by thread: Re: [XenPPC] [xenppc-unstable] [ppc] have xen_start_info_t using xen_ulong_t
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.