[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-merge] fs/gs handling
Any reason that fs/gs are specifically handled with mov not movl in these cases? #define deactivate_mm(tsk, mm) \ - asm("movl %0,%%fs ; movl %0,%%gs": :"r" (0)) + asm("mov %0,%%fs ; mov %0,%%gs": :"r" (0)) or +static inline void __prepare_arch_switch(void) ... + __asm__ __volatile__ ( "mov %%fs,%0 ; mov %%gs,%1" + : "=m" (*(int *)¤t->thread.fs), + "=m" (*(int *)¤t->thread.gs)); + __asm__ __volatile__ ( "mov %0,%%fs ; mov %0,%%gs" + : : "r" (0) ); _______________________________________________ Xen-merge mailing list Xen-merge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-merge
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |