[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Re: How about stub-domain in IPF-Xen now?

To: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:51:41 +0200
Cc: "xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:51:47 -0700
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
Mail-followup-to: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Zhang, Jingke" <jingke.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Isaku Yamahata, le Thu 23 Oct 2008 12:42:30 +0900, a écrit :
> Unfortunately I don't have any plan on stub domain/ia64 in near future.
> To be honest I'm not sure what amount work it would be to support
> stub domain on IA64.

What is essentially needed is to write virtual memory management for
MiniOS (for now it just uses a 1:1 physical management).

Samuel

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

References:
- [Xen-ia64-devel] How about stub-domain in IPF-Xen now?
  - From: Zhang, Jingke
- [Xen-ia64-devel] Re: How about stub-domain in IPF-Xen now?
  - From: Isaku Yamahata

Prev by Date: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel][PATCH][VTD] small patches for VTD
Next by Date: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18688, Linux#705, ioemu#629adb3f... Status --- no new issue, report 3 old bugs
Previous by thread: [Xen-ia64-devel] Re: How about stub-domain in IPF-Xen now?
Next by thread: [Xen-ia64-devel][PATCH][VTD]P2M entry may change from _PAGE_IO to real MMIO page
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.