[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] EFI Mapping Windows Install Crash Bug
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 09:27:31PM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote: > On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 08:50:56PM +1000, Simon Horman wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have been looking over the SAL manual and looking into where > > exactly the lockup that I am seeing occurs. > > > > What seems to happen is this. > > > > If ia64_mca_cpe_int_caller() is called from vmx context (is that the > > right word?) then when it calls ia64_log_queue() which in turn calls > > ia64_sal_get_state_info() then as the SAL_GET_STATE_INFO call is being > > made (I'm pretty sure that it is inside the firmware) > > ia64_mca_ucmc_handler() is invoked. I presume that this is because an > > unrecoverable machine check occurs during the SAL_GET_STATE_INFO call. > > > > The call to ia64_mca_ucmc_handler() seems to complete successfully > > (including a call to ia64_sal_get_state_info() via ia64_log_queue()). > > Just after that the hypervisor locks up, presumably because execution > > goes back to the original SAL_GET_STATE_INFO call that caused the > > unrecoverable machine check. > > > > With regards to rr7. It is not set to EFI RR when entering > > ia64_mca_cpe_int_caller(), but it is when entering > > ia64_mca_ucmc_handler(), which makes sense, as it should be set when > > going into the first SAL_GET_STATE_INFO call. > > That's great. > Table 9-2 SAL spec says that SAL_GET_STATE_INFO is NOT reentrant, > the above explains why the hypervisor locks up. I see, good point. > > My latest micro-hack involves having ia64_sal_get_state_info() return 0, > > without going into SAL, if VMX_DOMAIN(current) is true, which seems to > > work. > > > > I will ponder the SAL manual some more to try and work out why > > EFI RR + VMX (+ IRQ?) + SAL_GET_STATE_INFO -> bad > > Yes, now the next question is why the mca occurs and > whether it can/should be avoided. Yes, I agree. That is the question I need to investigate. > Is it possible to determine what mca occurs? > The mca record might be in nvram, if so there should be a way > to retrieve them. Good idea, I will check tomorrow. _______________________________________________ Xen-ia64-devel mailing list Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |