[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-ia64-devel] Re: [PATCH] raise a fault with unimplemented physical address

To: Kouya Shimura <kouya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:56:48 -0600
Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:57:00 -0700
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 11:33 +0900, Kouya Shimura wrote:
> An unimplemented data fault or an unimplemented instruction trap
> should be raised with unimplemented physical address.
> Also some cleanups.

   Applied.  Thanks,

        Alex

-- 
Alex Williamson                             HP Open Source & Linux Org.


_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

References:
- [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] fix behavior with unimplemented physical address
  - From: Kouya Shimura
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] fix behavior with unimplemented physical address
  - From: Tristan Gingold
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] fix behavior with unimplemented physical address
  - From: Kouya Shimura
- [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] raise a fault with unimplemented physical address
  - From: Kouya Shimura

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Patch] cleanup set_psr_l
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Re: [patch] ia64: kexec: add __va_efi
Previous by thread: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] raise a fault with unimplemented physical address
Next by thread: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH][RFC] fix DTLB miss behavior with physical mode
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.