[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] HVM Multi-Processor Performance followup


  • To: "Kayvan Sylvan" <kayvan@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-ia64-devel" <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Xu, Anthony" <anthony.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 09:11:18 +0800
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:22:35 -0800
  • List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AchkbU0QUXvEz265Rz+YrZc2lMHX+QAAYoPg
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-ia64-devel] HVM Multi-Processor Performance followup

Thanks for your efforts
 
You can see the drop in performance starts to get really bad at about 9 CPUs and beyond
 
If you increase guest vCPU number, the bottleneck may be dom0 vCPU number( only 1vCPU for dom0).
 
You can try configure two/four vCPU for dom0, the performance may be back.
 
a curious question,
 
Alex said there are ~70% degradation on RE-AIM7,
Your test result seems much better than his.
 
What's the difference of your test environment?
 
Thanks,
Anthony
 


From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kayvan Sylvan
Sent: 2008年2月1日 8:57
To: xen-ia64-devel
Subject: [Xen-ia64-devel] HVM Multi-Processor Performance followup

Hi everyone,

 

A follow-up on the multiprocessor performance benchmark on HVM guests.

 

We ran the RE-AIM7 benchmarks on a 5-cell (40 CPU) machine and a single-cell 8-cpu NEC machine.

 

Here are the jobs per minute maximums.

 

You can see the drop in performance starts to get really bad at about 9 CPUs and beyond.

 

Questions:

 

1.       What can I do to help improve this situation?

2.       Are there any other experiments I can run?

3.       What tools/profilers will help to gather more data here?

 

I am very interested in helping to solve this problem! Thanks for your ideas and suggestions.

 

Best regards,

 

---Kayvan

 

 

Xen performance comparison on 5-Cell NEC machine (each cell with 4 dual-core Itaniums)

CPUs

Native Jobs/Min

HVM Jobs/Min

Overhead

1

2037

1791

12.08%

2

4076

3615

11.31%

3

6090

5221

14.27%

4

8118

6839

15.76%

5

10119

8404

16.95%

6

12037

9949

17.35%

7

14106

11095

21.35%

8

15953

12360

22.52%

9

18059

13201

26.90%

10

20170

13742

31.87%

11

21896

13694

37.46%

12

24079

13331

44.64%

13

25992

12374

52.39%

14

28072

11684

58.38%

15

29931

11032

63.14%

16

31696

10451

67.03%

The guest OS was CentOS-4.6 with 2GB of memory,

running under a Dom0 that was limited to 1 VCPU.

 

Xen performance comparison on 1-Cell NEC machine (4 dual core Itanium Montecito)

CPUs

Native Jobs/Min

HVM Jobs/Min

Overhead

1

2037

1779

12.67%

2

4067

3619

11.02%

3

6097

5344

12.35%

4

8112

7004

13.66%

5

10145

8663

14.61%

6

12023

10213

15.05%

7

14083

11249

20.12%

8

16182

12969

19.86%

The guest OS was CentOS-4.6 with 2GB of memory,

running under a Dom0 that was limited to 1 VCPU.


Powered by EditGrid - Online Spreadsheets

Source: CPU Performance

 

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.