[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Use saner dom0 memory and vcpu defaults, don't panic on over-allocation
Alex Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 10:11 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: >> Alex Williamson wrote: >>> I think we're going to have to go with something like this, but why >>> would we reduce the cap to 64MB? I usually think of ia64 systems as >>> having "bigger" I/O than x86, so it seems like maybe we want to stick >>> with at least 128MB(?) >> I think my original thought was that since your 96G box only needed >> really 17MB, 64MB was a ton to withhold. But after hitting send, I was >> thinking that no cap at all might make more sense -- you'd need 288GB of >> RAM to even get to 64MB here, and that's a tiny drop in the bucket when >> you have that much. Even with 1TB of RAM, we would still withhold less >> than 256MB. Until we have some 1TB+ systems to test on, we don't really >> know if reserving more than 128MB makes sense or not... I'd have to lean >> toward simply not capping this withholding at all, at least for right now. > > That sounds ok with me, we can continue to fine tune it via bug > reports if it's insufficient. Okay, attaching one more rendition of the patch that goes this route. > [snip] >> But then I don't know what the typical end-user use case of ia64 xen is, >> or what the average system size is, which would seem to be a fairly >> relevant factor in deciding the most reasonable defaults... My intuition >> says that most of our customers would like to have their systems boot up >> using all available resources though. That, and I'm already starting to >> feel like a 4G/4cpu default is a bit wimpy. :) > > It's ok to assign all memory and cpu to dom0 if you intend to use dom0 > as a compute server, but that's not really the way dom0 is meant to be > used in a virtualized environment. IIRC, dom0 has some scheduling > preference over domUs, and can therefore starve or reduce the > performance of the virtualized guests. It's recommended that dom0 is > primarily used as a management domain for the other guests and not used > as your primary workload server. IMHO, reducing the default set of > resources available to dom0 encourages this behavior. Thanks, Also leaving the default a 4G/4cpu. I understand the argument for keeping the allocations minimal and how dom0 *should* be used, I just anticipate customers wondering where all their resources went. We can just relnote it though, I think this is a reasonable compromise. -- Jarod Wilson jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx Some ia64 xen dom0 tweaks: * Increase default memory allocation from 512M to 4G * Increase default vcpu allocation from 1 to 4 * Implement rough calculation of what the maximum memory that can be safely allocated to dom0 is * If need be, scale down requested memory allocation to fit available memory, rather than simply panicking * If dom0_mem=0 is specified, allocate all available mem Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx> diff -r 039f2ccb1e38 xen/arch/ia64/xen/domain.c --- a/xen/arch/ia64/xen/domain.c Tue Jul 31 10:30:40 2007 -0600 +++ b/xen/arch/ia64/xen/domain.c Tue Aug 07 16:41:39 2007 -0400 @@ -52,10 +52,11 @@ #include <asm/perfmon.h> #include <public/vcpu.h> -static unsigned long __initdata dom0_size = 512*1024*1024; +/* dom0_size: default memory allocation for dom0 (~4GB) */ +static unsigned long __initdata dom0_size = 4096UL*1024UL*1024UL; /* dom0_max_vcpus: maximum number of VCPUs to create for dom0. */ -static unsigned int __initdata dom0_max_vcpus = 1; +static unsigned int __initdata dom0_max_vcpus = 4; integer_param("dom0_max_vcpus", dom0_max_vcpus); extern char dom0_command_line[]; @@ -1195,8 +1196,41 @@ static void __init loaddomainelfimage(st } } -void __init alloc_dom0(void) -{ +static void __init calc_dom0_size(void) +{ + unsigned long domheap_pages; + unsigned long p2m_pages; + unsigned long spare_hv_pages; + unsigned long max_dom0_size; + + /* Estimate maximum memory we can safely allocate for dom0 + * by subtracting the p2m table allocation and a chunk of memory + * for DMA and PCI mapping from the available domheap pages. The + * chunk for DMA, PCI, etc., is a guestimate, as xen doesn't seem + * to have a good idea of what those requirements might be ahead + * of time, calculated at 1MB per 4GB of system memory */ + domheap_pages = avail_domheap_pages(); + p2m_pages = domheap_pages / PTRS_PER_PTE; + spare_hv_pages = domheap_pages / 4096; + max_dom0_size = (domheap_pages - (p2m_pages + spare_hv_pages)) + * PAGE_SIZE; + printk("Maximum permitted dom0 size: %luMB\n", + max_dom0_size / (1024*1024)); + + /* validate proposed dom0_size, fix up as needed */ + if (dom0_size > max_dom0_size) { + printk("Reducing dom0 memory allocation from %luK to %luK " + "to fit available memory\n", + dom0_size / 1024, max_dom0_size / 1024); + dom0_size = max_dom0_size; + } + + /* dom0_mem=0 can be passed in to give all available mem to dom0 */ + if (dom0_size == 0) { + printk("Allocating all available memory to dom0\n"); + dom0_size = max_dom0_size; + } + /* Check dom0 size. */ if (dom0_size < 4 * 1024 * 1024) { panic("dom0_mem is too small, boot aborted" @@ -1261,6 +1295,8 @@ int __init construct_dom0(struct domain BUG_ON(v->is_initialised); printk("*** LOADING DOMAIN 0 ***\n"); + + calc_dom0_size(); max_pages = dom0_size / PAGE_SIZE; d->max_pages = max_pages; diff -r 039f2ccb1e38 xen/arch/ia64/xen/xensetup.c --- a/xen/arch/ia64/xen/xensetup.c Tue Jul 31 10:30:40 2007 -0600 +++ b/xen/arch/ia64/xen/xensetup.c Wed Aug 01 13:44:31 2007 -0400 @@ -46,7 +46,6 @@ extern void early_setup_arch(char **); extern void early_setup_arch(char **); extern void late_setup_arch(char **); extern void hpsim_serial_init(void); -extern void alloc_dom0(void); extern void setup_per_cpu_areas(void); extern void mem_init(void); extern void init_IRQ(void); @@ -469,8 +468,6 @@ void __init start_kernel(void) trap_init(); - alloc_dom0(); - init_xenheap_pages(__pa(xen_heap_start), xenheap_phys_end); printk("Xen heap: %luMB (%lukB)\n", (xenheap_phys_end-__pa(xen_heap_start)) >> 20, Attachment:
signature.asc _______________________________________________ Xen-ia64-devel mailing list Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |