[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Question to frametable_miss()

To: Dietmar Hahn <dietmar.hahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: tgingold@xxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 17:55:07 +0200
Cc: xen-ia64-devel <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:03:36 -0700
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Quoting Dietmar Hahn <dietmar.hahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> What is the sense of the 0x700 ? Currently Xen doesn't use protection keys.
> So why is this explicitly set here?
> Many thanks for any hints!

I suppose this is debugging code. I can't see any other reason too.
Fujitsu people may confirm.

Tristan.

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

References:
- [Xen-ia64-devel] Question to frametable_miss()
  - From: Dietmar Hahn

Prev by Date: [Xen-ia64-devel] Question to frametable_miss()
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [patch] sn2 global_tlb_purge implementation
Previous by thread: [Xen-ia64-devel] Question to frametable_miss()
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Question to frametable_miss()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.