[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Re: status of lib/swiotlb.c cleanups?
Unfortunately I don't think we can make any more significant progress in mainline linux; some smaller parts of the abstraction patch might get accepted, but I think we win pretty little unless we can actually drop the Xen special altogether. What I wanted to do occasionally, though, is at least move arch/i386/kernel/swiotlb.c to lib/swiotlb-xen.c and sync the Xen side to match native as closely as possible. Didn't get to this so far, though. Jan >>> Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxx> 04/30/07 5:52 PM >>> Hi Jan, I'm curious about the status of your patches to make lib/swiotlb.c more Xen friendly. The ia64 port is currently using the hacked up swiotlb in the i386 directory, and it's making it difficult to enable machine vectors to support hardware iommus. From what I can gather, several of the smaller patches are now in upstream Linux, but the larger abstraction patch got rejected. Are we at a standstill with upstream Linux until Xen is merged in? Is anyone interested in modifying lib/swiotlb.c in our local Xen copy of the Linux tree? On ia64 we can get by with fairly trivial paravirtualization of swiotlb, I'd imagine x86_64 can as well. Thanks, Alex -- Alex Williamson HP Open Source & Linux Org. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |