[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] problems with smp


  • To: "Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@xxxxxx>
  • From: "David Brown" <dmlb2000@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 16:02:21 -0800
  • Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 16:01:33 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=REdQlFY6dcG1G2DcvnyRyuMhxK4wYmpLcOEbuRWx7T3DBfpbiinVL9EL5Rihoz1oRuUAFl9jckO5mOdshnJU1CF/q6ZVyQGEfBvjWeyI90K8pQmHV3BuzYel7JYSmWL7rODKCmtzsr6aCWyIR4FVHxNVPcM6omMwVGVgHlX83N4=
  • List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>

   What kind of load are you running?  If it involves I/O, then all that
has to go through dom0 and can bottleneck the other domains.  There's
also some overhead in scheduling between vCPUs and time spent running in
Xen itself, so you may not be able to reach that 200% total, but I'd
think you could get closer than 150%.  Thanks,


Yeah, its very I/O driven, running a distributed filesystem under
xen... so could the xen kernel be switching too much then? is there
anyway to provide some nice like level to an OS so that it can get
most of the time running? Would pci sharing rather than block sharing
help (if there's more than one block per pci device)?

- David Brown

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.