[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Question: Big Endian domU's


  • To: "Xu, Anthony" <anthony.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Dietmar Hahn <dietmar.hahn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 10:03:06 +0100
  • Cc: xen-ia64-devel <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 01:03:25 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: s=s768; d=fujitsu-siemens.com; c=nofws; q=dns; b=B4QQwwYO8+dlpY95hzSIbty5Cug1VR8nqzUQ3l1WFFgmO3w0sxcHUEvFAf76QyLFOwtgwNLXibjEAqJA87GVGYbwbZ41GqjOeXOU09+btiJK6k23A5WMqYnFve+SXqdW;
  • List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Hi Anthony,

> What is the OS using big endian?
It's BS2000 from Fujitsu Siemens Computers. BS2000 is a IBM-390 like mainframe
OS. We do some conceptual studies together with linux and ia64.

> It may not be that easy for supporting big endian.
> XEN may need to access address space which belonging to guest OS,
> So XEN need to take care of big endian.
Yes I understand this.

> Because Linux and Windows are using little endian, we don't take big endian 
into consideration from beginning.
This is logical.

> There are many places we need to change for supporting big endian OS.
I know it's a lot to do.
With the mini-os port to ia64 I'm on the way to get more familiar with the xen
interfaces. The next step will be to look deeper in the xen internals. And a
big endian mini-os can be used as the test vehicle.

> 
> But, if you can describe your scenario in depth, Maybe we can increase the 
priority of supporting big endian OS.
> 
> Anthony
Thanks.

Dietmar.

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.