[XenPPC] Re: xencomm porting and "inline" handles

[Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 10:04 +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> 
> After more work, inline xencomm is not that magic: it doesn't work for
> modules which are loaded in virtual memory.  So I have to use mini
> xencomm at least for modules.

What's the problem with modules? Their text/data isn't physically
contiguous, but where exactly is the problem?

-- 
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center


_______________________________________________
Xen-ppc-devel mailing list
Xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel