[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: PATCH (and RFC): new dom0 hypercall: DOM0_DOMAIN_SETUP
On 19 Jun 2006, at 15:43, Tristan Gingold wrote: Why not defining an arch-dependant struct for adding more fields to this structure ? (I prefer to do that early than breaking compatibility later).I'd like the patch modified as follows: * Change flag name to XEN_DOMAINSETUP_hvm_guest (explicitly in Xen namespace; more the style of other flags added recently; not VMX specific). * Place the final two fields of the struct inside ifdef __ia64__. How does that ease binary compatibility if you want to add extra common fields later? You mean to have a pointer to the arch-dep struct? -- KeirPS. The flag name: DOM0_DOMAIN_SETUP_ would actually be a fine prefix for flags. Use whatever you prefer. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |