RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [ww24]

["yo.fujita" <yo.fujita@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Yongkang,

Thanks for your information!
We also must try the latest changeset.
If it happens again, the cause is in our environment.
I'll inform you a result. Please wait for a while.

Thanks,
Fujita
> -----Original Message-----
> From: You, Yongkang [mailto:yongkang.you@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 3:37 PM
> To: yo.fujita; Alex Williamson
> Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [ww24]
> 
> Hi Fujita,
> 
> I tried the latest Changeset 10419. But I couldn't reproduce this problem
in
> my box. Is it fixed? I create and destroy SMP XenU for more than 100
times.
> And try to make kernels in xenU 2 times. I didn't meet the xen0 hang.
> 
> My box has 3072M memory. Xen0 has 512M, xenU has 512M. XenU has been
assigned
> with 2 CPUs.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: yo.fujita [mailto:yo.fujita@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> >Sent: 2006年6月19日 10:27
> >To: You, Yongkang; 'Alex Williamson'
> >Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [ww24]
> >
> >> Hi Fujita,
> >>
> >> Maybe it is not guest image issue. In our nightly testing for XenU, we
> >still
> >> focus on the UP stability and basic booting/destroying testing.
Automatic
> >SMP
> >> XenU isn't fully added into nightly testing (will add it this week). I
> >noticed
> >> your report mentioned that the stress testing and keeping
> >creating/destroying
> >> SMP XenU will catch this issue. I can do some trying to see if I can
> >reproduce.
> >Hi Yongkang,
> >
> >Thanks for your comments.
> >As you said, I meant the problem is not in the image itself but the
stress
> >of booting domU. In other words, I thought larger size image takes more
> >stress on Xen.
> >So I guess a customized image for testing (necessity minimum size)
doesn't
> >cause
> >the problem.
> >We appreciate it if you can try to reproduce these issues.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Fujita
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康
> >>
> >> >-----Original Message-----
> >> >From: yo.fujita [mailto:yo.fujita@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> >> >Sent: 2006年6月19日 8:53
> >> >To: 'Alex Williamson'; You, Yongkang
> >> >Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [ww24]
> >> >
> >> >>    Thanks Fujita.  Is anyone else seeing these hangs booting domU?
> >> >> The Intel status report on the same changeset has no indication of
> >> >> dom0 hangs on their tests.
> >> >Hi Alex, Yongkang,
> >> >
> >> > In Fujitsu, it's only me who saw this problem because few developers
> >have
> >> >started any tests relating to SMP.
> >> >I think the reason why Intel's results was not match to ours is the
> >> >difference of stress on booting SMP domU because the our guest image
is
> >just
> >> >only a copy of root file system of native Linux, which any functions
was
> >not
> >> >edited.
> >> >
> >> >My domU environment.
> >> >Disk size :5G
> >> >OS        :RHEL4U2
> >> >Memory    :512M
> >> >CPUs      :2
> >> >Yongkang, do you have any comments?
> >> >
> >> >> Has anything else changed in the test environment?  Thanks,
> >> >No. We switched this test to SMP from UP two weeks ago.
> >> >
> >> >Thanks,
> >> >Fujita



_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel