RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [ww24]

["You, Yongkang" <yongkang.you@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Fujita,

Maybe it is not guest image issue. In our nightly testing for XenU, we still 
focus on the UP stability and basic booting/destroying testing. Automatic SMP 
XenU isn't fully added into nightly testing (will add it this week). I noticed 
your report mentioned that the stress testing and keeping creating/destroying 
SMP XenU will catch this issue. I can do some trying to see if I can reproduce.

Best Regards,
Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康

>-----Original Message-----
>From: yo.fujita [mailto:yo.fujita@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: 2006年6月19日 8:53
>To: 'Alex Williamson'; You, Yongkang
>Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [ww24]
>
>>    Thanks Fujita.  Is anyone else seeing these hangs booting domU?
>> The Intel status report on the same changeset has no indication of
>> dom0 hangs on their tests.
>Hi Alex, Yongkang,
>
> In Fujitsu, it's only me who saw this problem because few developers have
>started any tests relating to SMP.
>I think the reason why Intel's results was not match to ours is the
>difference of stress on booting SMP domU because the our guest image is just
>only a copy of root file system of native Linux, which any functions was not
>edited.
>
>My domU environment.
>Disk size :5G
>OS        :RHEL4U2
>Memory    :512M
>CPUs      :2
>Yongkang, do you have any comments?
>
>> Has anything else changed in the test environment?  Thanks,
>No. We switched this test to SMP from UP two weeks ago.
>
>Thanks,
>Fujita

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel