RE: [Xen-ia64-devel][PATCH] Enable SMP on VTI domain.

["Xu, Anthony" <anthony.xu@xxxxxxxxx>]

>From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Xu, Anthony
>Sent: 2006年5月31日 16:25
>To: Tristan Gingold; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel][PATCH] Enable SMP on VTI domain.
>
>>From: Tristan Gingold
>>Sent: 2006年5月31日 16:07
>>To: Xu, Anthony; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel][PATCH] Enable SMP on VTI domain.
>>
>>Le Mercredi 31 Mai 2006 09:32, Xu, Anthony a écrit :
>>> This patch intends to enable SMP on VTI domain.
>>>
>>> This patch depends on previous three patches I sent out.
>>> 1. fixed a bug which causes Oops
>>> 2. fixed a small bug about VTLB
>>> 3. Add sal emulation to VTI domain
>>>
>>> This patch uses IPI to implement global purge.
>>>
>>> If you want to reproduce what I did, you may need to get the
>>> newest guest FIRMWARE.
>>Good work!
>>
>>Two comments:
>>* could you postpone your patch until I resend my cpu hotplug patch ?
>>I have to modify the start-up ipi, which you are reusing.  (Should it be
>>common ?)
>It should be Ok, if it doesn't take long.
Further thinking,
Will this patch block your cpu hotplug patch?
If no, I think this patch should be checked in, and if needed, I will
update start-up ipi.

>>
>>* I may be wrong, but why are you using a cpu/lid table ?
>Maybe I understand mistakenly,
>I'm using cpu/lid table to send IPI
>
>
>>I think Xen can
>>impose lid to the guest firmware.  Things will be a little simpler.
>I don't catch you, Could you explain in more detail?
>
>
>
>>
>>Tristan.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
>Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel