RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] I found 4 exact LTP cases failed in IA64/Xen0 with1700+ cases until now.

["You, Yongkang" <yongkang.you@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi all, 

Sorry to reply later. I am in long vocation. My email checking is occasion.
I am very glad to share our testing results with you in future. I have done 
Native, Xen0 and VTI domain LTP testing and some other basic testing. 

My LTP on Native are all pass too, like Fujita's result. :) The LTP on VTI 
domain are usually all pass.

After I go back to office again, I will do more testing for IA64 Xen, collect 
and send out the results.

Best Regards,
Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康

>-----Original Message-----
>From: yo.fujita [mailto:yo.fujita@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: 2006年1月30日 13:46
>To: 'Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)'; You, Yongkang;
>xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] I found 4 exact LTP cases failed in IA64/Xen0
>with1700+ cases until now.
>
>Hi Dan, Yongkang,
>
>> Could you share information with each other about what
>> LTP tests are passing and failing?
>Yes, I think that it is very important.
>I match it with a version of his LTP to share information
>with Yongkang.
>However, because my information is on domU, the result might be
>different from Yongkang.
>
>> I think it is important to have the weekly testing
>> but I think that if a test fails on native Linux/ia64,
>> we should not consider it as a failure on Xen/ia64.
>In my case, LTP on native linux is all success.
>
>Thanks,
>Fujita
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
>[mailto:dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx]
>> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 9:37 AM
>> To: You, Yongkang; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; yo.fujita
>> Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] I found 4 exact LTP cases failed in
>IA64/Xen0
>> with1700+ cases until now.
>>
>> Yongkang and Fujita --
>>
>> Could you share information with each other about what
>> LTP tests are passing and failing?  I think it is important
>> to have the weekly testing but I think that if a test
>> fails on native Linux/ia64, we should not consider it
>> as a failure on Xen/ia64.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dan
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > [mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
>> > Of You, Yongkang
>> > Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 4:45 PM
>> > To: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > Subject: [Xen-ia64-devel] I found 4 exact LTP cases failed in
>> > IA64/Xen0 with1700+ cases until now.
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > This is a resend email, because the last email is too large
>> > to reach the Mailing list. :)
>> >
>> > I have reported 4 cases failed or crashed in the past several
>> > days. Now I have finished a fuller LTP testing, which
>> > executed 1700+ cases (there are some duplicated cases).
>> > Excluding the cases that are failed on Native Linux too, I
>> > only caught 4 special failed cases, which I have reported yet.
>> >
>> > Now I have a brief summary:
>> > ======Test environment=====
>> > Xen0: RHEL4u2
>> > Xen Source: xen-ia64-unstable 8481
>> > LTP Source: 2005-12-5
>> > ========================
>> >
>> > The following testcases do Not pass:
>> > FAIL ltp:syscalls Case alarm04
>> > FAIL ltp:math float_exp_log
>> > FAIL ltp:math float_power
>> > CRASH ltp:crashme crash01
>> >
>> > The following is only the summary of testing result. It is
>> > automatically counted by LTP script. So the total failed case
>> > number can't show the real IA64 Xen0 status. The exact failed
>> > cases have been listed above.
>> >
>> >                Summary Test Report of Last Session
>> >
>============================================================
>=
>> > =                Total     Pass      Fail     NoResult     Crash
>> >
>============================================================
>=
>> > =ltp             1739      1692       46         0          1
>> > stress_part2      22        20        2          0          0
>> > mm                21        21        0          0          0
>> > nptl              1         1         0          0          0
>> > multicast         4         1         3          0          0
>> > commands          11        8         3          0          0
>> > pty               3         3         0          0          0
>> > pipes             6         6         0          0          0
>> > network_comman    7         6         1          0          0
>> > quickhit         121       121        0          0          0
>> > sched             3         3         0          0          0
>> > fs                54        54        0          0          0
>> > syscalls         685       684        1          0          0
>> > admin_tools       8         7         1          0          0
>> > dio               28        28        0          0          0
>> > fsx               1         0         1          0          0
>> > ipc               8         8         0          0          0
>> > math              10        8         2          0          0
>> > ltplite          320       315        5          0          0
>> > stress_part1     127       102        25         0          0
>> > crashme           1         0         0          0          1
>> > stress_part3     298       296        2          0          0
>> >
>============================================================
>=
>> > =Total           1739      1692       46         0          1
>> >
>> > Best Regards,
>> > Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
>> > Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
>> >

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel