[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] I found 4 exact LTP cases failed in IA64/Xen0 with1700+ cases until now.
Hi Dan, Yongkang, > Could you share information with each other about what > LTP tests are passing and failing? Yes, I think that it is very important. I match it with a version of his LTP to share information with Yongkang. However, because my information is on domU, the result might be different from Yongkang. > I think it is important to have the weekly testing > but I think that if a test fails on native Linux/ia64, > we should not consider it as a failure on Xen/ia64. In my case, LTP on native linux is all success. Thanks, Fujita > -----Original Message----- > From: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) [mailto:dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 9:37 AM > To: You, Yongkang; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; yo.fujita > Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] I found 4 exact LTP cases failed in IA64/Xen0 > with1700+ cases until now. > > Yongkang and Fujita -- > > Could you share information with each other about what > LTP tests are passing and failing? I think it is important > to have the weekly testing but I think that if a test > fails on native Linux/ia64, we should not consider it > as a failure on Xen/ia64. > > Thanks, > Dan > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > [mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf > > Of You, Yongkang > > Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 4:45 PM > > To: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [Xen-ia64-devel] I found 4 exact LTP cases failed in > > IA64/Xen0 with1700+ cases until now. > > > > Hi all, > > > > This is a resend email, because the last email is too large > > to reach the Mailing list. :) > > > > I have reported 4 cases failed or crashed in the past several > > days. Now I have finished a fuller LTP testing, which > > executed 1700+ cases (there are some duplicated cases). > > Excluding the cases that are failed on Native Linux too, I > > only caught 4 special failed cases, which I have reported yet. > > > > Now I have a brief summary: > > ======Test environment===== > > Xen0: RHEL4u2 > > Xen Source: xen-ia64-unstable 8481 > > LTP Source: 2005-12-5 > > ======================== > > > > The following testcases do Not pass: > > FAIL ltp:syscalls Case alarm04 > > FAIL ltp:math float_exp_log > > FAIL ltp:math float_power > > CRASH ltp:crashme crash01 > > > > The following is only the summary of testing result. It is > > automatically counted by LTP script. So the total failed case > > number can't show the real IA64 Xen0 status. The exact failed > > cases have been listed above. > > > > Summary Test Report of Last Session > > ============================================================= > > = Total Pass Fail NoResult Crash > > ============================================================= > > =ltp 1739 1692 46 0 1 > > stress_part2 22 20 2 0 0 > > mm 21 21 0 0 0 > > nptl 1 1 0 0 0 > > multicast 4 1 3 0 0 > > commands 11 8 3 0 0 > > pty 3 3 0 0 0 > > pipes 6 6 0 0 0 > > network_comman 7 6 1 0 0 > > quickhit 121 121 0 0 0 > > sched 3 3 0 0 0 > > fs 54 54 0 0 0 > > syscalls 685 684 1 0 0 > > admin_tools 8 7 1 0 0 > > dio 28 28 0 0 0 > > fsx 1 0 1 0 0 > > ipc 8 8 0 0 0 > > math 10 8 2 0 0 > > ltplite 320 315 5 0 0 > > stress_part1 127 102 25 0 0 > > crashme 1 0 0 0 1 > > stress_part3 298 296 2 0 0 > > ============================================================= > > =Total 1739 1692 46 0 1 > > > > Best Regards, > > Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xen-ia64-devel mailing list > > Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel > > _______________________________________________ Xen-ia64-devel mailing list Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |