[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [12/4rd week]
Dan, I retested gcc loop on the changeset 8474. To our regret the same phenomenon occurred, this seems to be the same bug as you cited in the previous mail. I ran the test for about 2 hours and saw "segmentation fault" 3 times. In addition, I got the following kernel oops. " Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 32000f0002000000 collect2[22056]: Oops 11012296146944 [1] " I attach the result log to this mail. I'll try to see if I can narrow down the condition that causes this bug. Thanks Fujita > -----Original Message----- > From: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) [mailto:dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx] > Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 6:13 AM > To: yo.fujita; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [12/4rd week] > > I suspect that this is the same problem as reported here: > > http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-ia64-devel/2005-12/msg00185.h > tml > > This is the first report on domU. I've only observed it on dom0. > Because it seems random, it may be very difficult to track > down. > > Dan > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > [mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf > > Of yo.fujita > > Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 3:32 AM > > To: 'yo.fujita'; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [12/4rd week] > > > > Hi, all > > > > I had put out the following mail before. > > And, it was pointed out that there was an unexpected value in the > > bench result of DomU. > > Thanks, Eddie. > > > > Please look at the following value. > > dom0: > > C Compiler Throughput 702.0 lpm > > (60 secs, 3 samples) > > domU: > > C Compiler Throughput 64655.7 lpm > > (62 secs, 2 samples) > > > > dom0: > > Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2276.3 lpm > > (60 secs, 3 samples) > > domU: > > Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 473647.0 lpm > > (61 secs, 2 samples) > > > > The value of dom0 and domU is greatly different. > > I investigated this phenomenon. > > As for the understood thing, domU uncommonly abort in gcc. > > Please look at cc_loop.txt of the attached file. > > This is a result of loop only C compile of unixbench. > > When the result is Bad wait status:0xb or 0x100, the value will become > > abnormal. > > As for "Shell Scripts", it might be similar. > > the next benchmark will be executed with changeset8474. > > > > Thanks, > > Fujita > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > [mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On > > Behalf Of yo.fujita > > > Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 3:59 PM > > > To: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Subject: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [12/4rd week] > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I am investigating stability of Dom0 and DomU by using > > various benchmark > > > tools. > > > We Fujitsu contribute with the results of benchmarks to > > this community > > > periodically from now on. > > > > > > Although it is only the detail result of unixbench this > > time, we will post > > > the detail result of all benchmarks someday. > > > > > > The tool used now is as follows. > > > - unixbench4.1.0 > > > - bonnie++-1.03 > > > - ltp-full-20051103 > > > - iozone3_191 > > > - lmbench-3.0-a5 > > > > > > TEST ENVIRONMENT > > > Machine : Tiger4 > > > CPU : Itanium2 1.5GHz *2 (Madison) > > > MEM : 8GB > > > HDD : Ultra 320 SCSI 36.7GB(MAS3367NC) > > > KERN : 2.6.12-xen0 > > > changeset : 8372:7ef565a7cc86 (12/15 latest) > > > Dom0 OS : RHEL4 U2 (no SMP) > > > DomU OS : RHEL4 U2 (no SMP) > > > No. of DomU's : 1 > > > > > > SUMMARY > > > - ltp-full-20051103 :hang in bench testing. > > > - Iozone3_191 :hang in bench testing. > > > - bonnie++-1.03 :bench is pass. but hang immediately after. > > > > > > issues: > > > - If changeset is after 8732, DomU will not start. > > > > > > TEST RESULT > > > unixbench4.1.0 : PASS > > > bonnie++-1.03 : FAIL > > > ltp-full-20051103 : FAIL > > > iozone3_191 : PASS > > > lmbench-3.0-a5 : PASS > > > Thanks and best regards, > > > Fujita and Fujisu members > > _______________________________________________ Xen-ia64-devel mailing list Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |