[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Another important Xen/ia64 domU/vbd fix
Le Mercredi 04 Janvier 2006 16:55, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) a écrit : > > >If Xen requires virtual_mem_map, then dom0 will require it too. > > >Since dom0 can't work yet with virtual_mem_map, enabling it > > > > in Xen is moot, > > > > >isn't it ? > > > > > >Tristan. > > Yes, I agree. For virtual_mem_map to work, I think domain0 > needs to be given a granule of physical memory for each "island" > in the EFI memmap. I think this is a little bit too kludgy... > > Seems like that. If we add phys2mach (p!=m) concept into > > dom0, that's not the issue then. ;-) > > True. But if domain0 owns all of physical memory, its not > an issue either. The problem is that the current design > and implementation of Xen/ia64 management of physical memory > is half-way between two good solutions. We will need to > choose one solution soon. This should be a good discussion > at the Xen summit. I wholy agree with you. Tristan. _______________________________________________ Xen-ia64-devel mailing list Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |