[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] elilo compressed dom0 kernel support


  • To: "Williamson, Alex (Linux Kernel Dev)" <alex.williamson@xxxxxx>
  • From: "Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 11:35:12 -0800
  • Cc: "Johnson, Brett E \(Linux R&D - FTC\)" <brett@xxxxxx>, xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 19:34:48 +0000
  • List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcX22Jrg5nw3iNrGS2Wt+hAFSZlARAAnt1kg
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-ia64-devel] elilo compressed dom0 kernel support

Sounds good.  New xelilo.efi (and README) committed. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Williamson, Alex (Linux Kernel Dev) 
> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 5:38 PM
> To: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
> Cc: Yang, Fred; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Johnson, 
> Brett E (Linux R&D - FTC)
> Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] elilo compressed dom0 kernel support
> 
> On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 15:21 -0800, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort
> Collins) wrote:
> > Looks good.  Unless there is a commitment to have a binary
> > image somewhere "any day now", I think we should still leave
> > a binary in the xen hg tree.   I don't think we should require
> > Xen users to build a new version of elilo from source.
> > 
> > Is your binary OK for that?
> 
>    I'm hoping it's any day now, but better safe than sorry.  
> I'd include
> my binary and remove it when there's one on the sf.net page.  Thanks,
> 
>       Alex
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.