[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Community effort neededtocatch upwithxen-unstable


  • To: "Magenheimer, Dan \(HP Labs Fort Collins\)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>
  • From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 23:48:11 +0800
  • Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 15:45:57 +0000
  • List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcWvZqLq66NFDvT0SxG0t4WzIxQpTQAANxPQAPEyzMAABo/zoAAhfg1QABNlThAAJ/NpUAAGopdQACOWqnAAkG1c8AADC3iQ
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-ia64-devel] Community effort neededtocatch upwithxen-unstable

Hi, Dan,

        Actually... I gave up. ;-( It's easier to bring back previous fixes 
even when merge process made some regression, than manually pull in some 
specific changesets which furthermore require other related ones. Now 
xen_start_info becomes a pointer, and console driver was completely re-written 
to utilize xenstore, and more... So, please begin to merge the xenlinux, as a 
necessary step for subsequent debug. ;-)

Thanks,
Kevin

>-----Original Message-----
>From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tian, Kevin
>Sent: 2005年9月12日 22:21
>To: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
>Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Community effort neededtocatch upwithxen-unstable
>
>I've fixed obvious missing features for tools and can pass compilation now. 
>However
>there does have issue with xenlinux-ia64, like ctrl_if has been removed 
>completely
>and also a new xen console page is required now. I'm trying to pull in some 
>obvious
>patches to see whether it works. If failed and hard to make up, I'll request 
>your help to
>merge then.
>
>Thanks,
>Kevin
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
>[mailto:dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx]
>>Sent: 2005年9月10日 1:32
>>To: Tian, Kevin
>>Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Community effort neededtocatch 
>>upwithxen-unstable
>>
>>OK, I have just merged xen-unstable into xen-ia64-unstable
>>and made a few fixes so that it compiles and tested it
>>(by compiling Linux).
>>
>>Please try to compile tools and fix problems.
>>
>>I don't have any automated way to merge the xen-unstable
>>driver files into xenlinux and am hesitant to try it
>>again manually as I might break some of the fixes you
>>and John recently made, so it would probably be better
>>if you determine if merging is necessary for the driver
>>files too.
>>
>>Dan
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Tian, Kevin [mailto:kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx]
>>> Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 6:26 PM
>>> To: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins); Byrne, John (HP Labs)
>>> Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Community effort neededtocatch
>>> upwithxen-unstable
>>>
>>> Ha, yes. At least I see a new extra page required now for xen
>>> console, just like previous xenstore page. You may need to
>>> sync xen-ia64-unstable.hg first and I will take a look.
>>> (Maybe same thing needs for xenlinux-ia64?)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Kevin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> >-----Original Message-----
>>> >From: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
>>> [mailto:dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx]
>>> >Sent: 2005年9月9日 5:17
>>> >To: Tian, Kevin; Byrne, John (HP Labs)
>>> >Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Community effort neededtocatch
>>> upwithxen-unstable
>>> >
>>> >> >> BTW, I'll send out the tools change
>>> >> >> to xen mailing list, since some common code is changed
>>> upon ia64.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >Yes, it will be interesting to see if it gets in.  I hope it
>>> >> >does, but in the past Keir has been resistant to ifdef code.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >Please keep track of it and let us all know if it gets in!
>>> >>
>>> >> Yes, too many ifdefs are unacceptable. If the news is bad, we
>>> >> have to find other way, like trying to catch up with x86
>>> >> behavior closely to reduce such branches. ;-(
>>> >
>>> >Per Keir's response/permission, we can put the patch into
>>> >xen-ia64-unstable and he will pull it in the next update.
>>> >
>>> >First, however, it appears that we are behind again... I tried
>>> >applying the patch against xen-unstable tip and the patch
>>> >applied only with many hunk offsets.  The result didn't
>>> >compile (though probably not due to this specific patch).
>>> >
>>> >Dan
>>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
>Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.