[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] misra: deviate R2.6 for the labels generated by CASE_SIMD_*
- To: Shuaidong Chen <shuaidong.chen@xxxxxxx>
- From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 10:41:31 +0100
- Authentication-results: eu.smtp.expurgate.cloud; dkim=pass header.s=google header.d=suse.com header.i="@suse.com" header.h="Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:Autocrypt:From:Content-Language:References:Cc:To:Subject:User-Agent:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID"
- Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
- Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Doug Goldstein <cardoe@xxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Teddy Astie <teddy.astie@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dmytro Prokopchuk <dmytro_prokopchuk1@xxxxxxxx>, Grygorii Strashko <grygorii_strashko@xxxxxxxx>, Penny Zheng <penny.zheng@xxxxxxx>, Ray Huang <Ray.Huang@xxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 09:41:42 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 10.11.2026 08:12, Shuaidong Chen wrote:
> MISRA C:2012 Rule 2.6 (advisory) states that "a function should not
> contain unused label declarations".
>
> When SIMD emulation is compiled out of the x86 emulator (CONFIG_HVM=n),
> private.h defines X86EMUL_NO_SIMD and the CASE_SIMD_* macros
> deliberately expand to plain identifiers instead of case labels, so
> that the opcode switch builds without conditionals around every case.
> The labels they produce (e.g. Cs0x0f_0x2b) are never the target of a
> goto, and the build already passes -Wno-unused-label for this object.
>
> These cannot be annotated in the source: ECLAIR reports them at the
> macro's use site, while __maybe_unused could only live in the macro's
> replacement list, out of reach of the existing text-based R2.6
> deviation. Extend that deviation to labels coming from the expansion
> of a CASE_SIMD_* macro, and document it.
__maybe_unused could be passed as another argument into the macros. That
would feel redundant, but if that's the only way to please Eclair, maybe
that's the way to go.
Like for the other patch I'd also like to understand why fiddling with
emulator code suddenly becomes necessary, when we already have a blanket
exclusion for e.g. rule 16.2.
Finally, for both patches - aren't your Cc lists excessively long?
Jan
|