[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v11 1/4] xen/device-tree: Parse 'cpu-map' node for CPU topology exploration


  • To: Hirokazu Takahashi <taka@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 12:48:57 +0200
  • Authentication-results: eu.smtp.expurgate.cloud; dkim=pass header.s=google header.d=suse.com header.i="@suse.com" header.h="Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:Autocrypt:From:Content-Language:References:Cc:To:Subject:User-Agent:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID"
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: michal.orzel@xxxxxxx, Mykyta_Poturai@xxxxxxxx, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@xxxxxxx>, Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 10:49:07 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 13.10.2026 12:36, Hirokazu Takahashi wrote:
> Parse the 'cpu-map' node in the Device Tree to extract CPU topology
> information. If the 'cpu-map' node is absent, simply ignore it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hirokazu Takahashi <taka@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> # common, acpi

Imo this should have been dropped, when the covered code ...

> ---
> Changes in v11:
>  - When parsing the Device Tree, ignore CPU nodes if the corresponding
>    physical CPU failed to boot, rather than treating it as an error.
>  - Drop the dependency on UNSUPPORTED for CPU topology support.
>  - Print an error message if memory allocation fails in init_cpu_topology().

... was touched at least for this change. Specifically ...

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/xen/common/cpu-topology.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +
> +#include <xen/acpi.h>
> +#include <xen/cpu-topology.h>
> +#include <xen/cpumask.h>
> +#include <xen/dt-cpu-topology.h>
> +#include <xen/init.h>
> +#include <xen/xvmalloc.h>
> +
> +static void __init free_topology_table(void)
> +{
> +    unsigned int cpu;
> +
> +    for ( cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; cpu++ )
> +    {
> +        free_cpumask_var(cpu_topology[cpu].thread_sibling);
> +        free_cpumask_var(cpu_topology[cpu].core_sibling);
> +        free_cpumask_var(cpu_topology[cpu].cluster_sibling);
> +    }
> +
> +    XVFREE(cpu_topology);
> +}
> +
> +void __init init_cpu_topology(void)
> +{
> +    unsigned int cpu;
> +    int ret;
> +
> +    if ( num_possible_cpus() == 1 )
> +        return;
> +
> +    cpu_topology = xvzalloc_array(struct cpu_topology, nr_cpu_ids);
> +    if ( !cpu_topology )
> +    {
> +        printk(XENLOG_WARNING "CPU topology table allocation failed.\n");

... for one, nit: No full stops please in log messages. And then, how can
a reader of the log tell this message from ...

> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    for ( cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; cpu++ )
> +    {
> +        if ( !zalloc_cpumask_var(&cpu_topology[cpu].thread_sibling) ||
> +             !zalloc_cpumask_var(&cpu_topology[cpu].core_sibling) ||
> +             !zalloc_cpumask_var(&cpu_topology[cpu].cluster_sibling) )
> +        {
> +            free_topology_table();
> +            printk(XENLOG_WARNING "CPU topology table allocation failed.\n");

... this one? Or if the message is meant to be the same, perhaps you want
to fold both printk()s (likely by way of using goto)?

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.