|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v1] xen/arm: validate non-common page-table ranges
On Fri Oct 2, 2026 at 9:14 PM CEST, Gabriel Quintáns Souto wrote:
> On arm32, page-tables are different on each CPUs, although they share some
> common mappings.
>
> The xen_pt_update function assumed that only said mappings would be
> modified, but did not check this assumption.
>
> Add a range check to reject modifications to non-common mappings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Quintáns Souto <gabi.qs.mail@xxxxxxxxx>
I'm not an arm person, so take this with a serious pinch of salt.
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/mmu/pt.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/mmu/pt.c b/xen/arch/arm/mmu/pt.c
> index 621b47d..ad0d1e6 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/mmu/pt.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/mmu/pt.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>
> #include <asm/current.h>
> #include <asm/fixmap.h>
> +#include <asm/mmu/layout.h>
>
> #ifdef NDEBUG
> static inline void
> @@ -589,6 +590,29 @@ static unsigned int xen_pt_check_contig(unsigned long
> vfn, mfn_t mfn,
> return XEN_PT_4K_NR_CONTIG;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_32
> +static bool ranges_overlap(unsigned long start1, unsigned long size1,
> + unsigned long start2, unsigned long size2)
> +{
> + if ( start1 < start2 )
> + return start2 - start1 < size1;
> +
> + return start1 - start2 < size2;
> +}
> +
> +static bool xen_pt_range_is_non_common(unsigned long virt,
We typically prefer positive helpers so you never end up with
!xen_pt_range_is_non_common(), which is awkward to read.
IMO, this should be xen_pt_range_is_common() with the reverse polarity
in the code elsewhere.
> + unsigned long size)
> +{
> + unsigned long temporary_start = TEMPORARY_AREA_ADDR(0);
> + unsigned long temporary_size = XEN_PT_LEVEL_SIZE(1);
> +
All ifdefs can go away if you do:
if ( !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_32) )
return 0;
... here. Everything else drops with DCE when compiling with ARM_32=n
both with DEBUG=y and DEBUG=n.
And codegen would be identical.
> + return ranges_overlap(virt, size,
> + DOMHEAP_VIRT_START, DOMHEAP_VIRT_SIZE) ||
> + ranges_overlap(virt, size,
> + temporary_start, temporary_size);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(xen_pt_lock);
>
> static int xen_pt_update(unsigned long virt,
> @@ -601,15 +625,13 @@ static int xen_pt_update(unsigned long virt,
> unsigned long vfn = virt >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> unsigned long left = nr_mfns;
>
> - /*
> - * For arm32, page-tables are different on each CPUs. Yet, they share
> - * some common mappings. It is assumed that only common mappings
> - * will be modified with this function.
> - *
> - * XXX: Add a check.
> - */
> const mfn_t root = maddr_to_mfn(READ_SYSREG64(TTBR0_EL2));
>
> + #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_32
> + if ( xen_pt_range_is_non_common(virt, nr_mfns * PAGE_SIZE) )
nit: Perhaps ASSERT_UNREACHABLE() here? Presumably this path is a
logical error.
> + return -EINVAL;
> + #endif
> +
> if ( flags_has_rwx(flags) )
> {
> mm_printk("Mappings should not be both Writeable and Executable.\n");
Cheers,
Alejandro
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |