Re: Re: [PATCH v5] x86/nSVM: Check injected event consistency

[Abdelkareem Abdelsaamad <abdelkareem.abdelsaamad@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 25.09.2026 11:15, Jan Beulich wrote:
>On 25.09.2026 11:38, Abdelkareem Abdelsaamad wrote:
>> On the AMD platforms, allowing a VMRUN instruction with a malformed VMCB has
>> debugging complications, security and performance implications. The APM
>> volume #2 15.20 (40332—Rev. 4.10—July 2026) states the two possibilities that
>> VMRUN will immediately exit with VMEXIT_INVALID due to the injected event.
>
>This is confusing: Another variant of this was sent a little under half an hour
>earlier. Simply going from size, the two also aren't identical. What's going on
>here?
The difference is minor. It is a reformat of the testing matrix table in an
attempt to better fit the xen-devel mailing list display. There is also
a change in the git send-email configuration of Roger's mail. The former can be
safely dropped."

Jan