|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v2 32/39] xen/riscv: remap interrupts to new IMSIC VS-file
> After new IMSIC VS-file is zeroed-out it is necessary to do G-stage remaping
> fo new IMSIC VS-file. Also, if any interrupts at an APLIC are forwarded by
> MSIs to the old interrupt file, reconfigure the APLIC to send them to the
> new interrupt file.
>
> Generally it is needed also to modify the relevant translation tables at
> all IOMMUs so that MSIs for this virtual interrupt file are now sent to
> the new physical interrupt file but it is skipped for now there is no IOMMU
> support for RISC-V.
>
> Synchronize with APLIC to ensure that no straggler MSIs will arrive at
> the old interrupt file by using of aplic_genmsi_barrier().
>
> Technically there is no need for read_lock_irqsave() and
> read_unlock_irqrestore() around reading of ->guest_file_id, as a write
> cannot happen in parallel: any update to ->guest_file_id for a vCPU
> will happen either in imsic_migrate_vcpu() itself or before the vCPU
> first gains control (in continue_new_vcpu()), so there is no concurrent
> access to it in imsic_migrate_vcpu(). The lock is added here for
> potential future cases.
>
> Keep BUG_ON("unimplemented") placeholder in imsic_migrate_vcpu() to guard
> against silent incorrect behaviour or unexpected panics in guest VMs until
> the function is fully implemented.
>
> imsic_map_guest_file() and imsic_update_state() are stubs for now and will
> be introduced later in a separate patch.
"will be introduced later" would be stale in the future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/riscv/imsic.c b/xen/arch/riscv/imsic.c
> index 5de4594961..5e9f6995e4 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/riscv/imsic.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/imsic.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
> #include <xen/xvmalloc.h>
>
> #include <asm/aia.h>
> +#include <asm/aplic.h>
> #include <asm/imsic.h>
>
> #define IMSIC_HART_SIZE(guest_bits) (BIT(guest_bits, U) * IMSIC_MMIO_PAGE_SZ)
> @@ -60,6 +61,12 @@ static unsigned int __ro_after_init guest_num_msis;
> #define IMSIC_DISABLE_EITHRESHOLD 1
> #define IMSIC_ENABLE_EITHRESHOLD 0
>
> +#define imsic_csr_read(c) \
> +({ \
> + csr_write(CSR_SISELECT, (c)); \
> + csr_read(CSR_SIREG); \
> +})
> +
> #define imsic_csr_write(c, v) \
> do { \
> csr_write(CSR_SISELECT, c); \
> @@ -141,6 +148,11 @@ unsigned int vcpu_guest_file_id(const struct vcpu *v)
> return ACCESS_ONCE(v->arch.vimsic_state->guest_file_id);
> }
>
> +void imsic_update_state(struct vcpu *v, unsigned int guest_file_id)
> +{
> + BUG_ON("unimplemented\n");
> +}
> +
> void __init imsic_ids_local_delivery(bool enable)
> {
> if ( enable )
> @@ -242,6 +254,15 @@ void imsic_irq_disable(unsigned int irq)
> spin_unlock(&imsic_cfg.lock);
> }
>
> +static bool imsic_local_is_pending(unsigned int id)
> +{
> + unsigned long isel =
> + (id / BITS_PER_LONG) * (BITS_PER_LONG / IMSIC_EIPx_BITS) +
> IMSIC_EIP0;
> + unsigned long bit = BIT(id % BITS_PER_LONG, UL);
> +
> + return !!(imsic_csr_read(isel) & bit);
> +}
> +
> /* Callers aren't intended to changed imsic_cfg so return const. */
> const struct imsic_config *imsic_get_config(void)
> {
> @@ -436,6 +457,11 @@ void cf_check imsic_ctxt_switch_to(struct vcpu *v)
> /* Nothing to do */
> }
>
> +int imsic_map_guest_file(struct vcpu *v, unsigned int vsfile_id)
> +{
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> +
> int cf_check vcpu_imsic_init(struct vcpu *v)
> {
> struct vimsic_state *imsic_state;
> @@ -497,6 +523,27 @@ static void imsic_call_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, void
> (*func)(void *),
> on_selected_cpus(cpumask_of(cpu), func, data, 1);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Ensure that all the MSIs the APLIC has already generated for the hart this
> + * runs on have really reached the hart's IMSIC.
> + *
> + * The barrier is the one described by the AIA specification in
> + * "Synchronizing interactions between a hart and the APLIC": ask the APLIC
> to
> + * send an MSI to the hart itself and wait until it shows up as pending in
> the
> + * hart's own interrupt file. As it says nothing about MSIs on their way to
> + * any other hart, it has to be executed by the pCPU owning the interrupt
> file
> + * the MSIs were being sent to.
> + */
> +static void cf_check imsic_aplic_sync(void *data)
It seems data arg is not used here
> +{
> + imsic_local_eix_update(imsic_cfg.sync_id, 1, true, false);
> +
> + aplic_genmsi_barrier();
> +
> + while ( !imsic_local_is_pending(imsic_cfg.sync_id) )
> + cpu_relax();
> +}
> +
> static void cf_check imsic_vsfile_local_clear(void *data)
> {
> unsigned int i;
> @@ -837,6 +884,10 @@ void imsic_migrate_vcpu(struct vcpu *v)
> struct imsic_vsfile_data vsfile_data = {
> .nr_eix = nr_hw_eix,
> };
> + struct vimsic_state *imsic_state = v->arch.vimsic_state;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + unsigned int old_vsfile_id;
> + unsigned int old_vsfile_cpu;
>
> /*
> * The scheduler can mark a freshly created vCPU's unit as migrated and
> @@ -848,8 +899,22 @@ void imsic_migrate_vcpu(struct vcpu *v)
> if ( v->arch.last_cpu == NR_CPUS )
> return;
>
> + read_lock_irqsave(&imsic_state->vsfile_lock, flags);
> + old_vsfile_id = imsic_state->guest_file_id;
> + old_vsfile_cpu = imsic_state->vsfile_cpu;
> + read_unlock_irqrestore(&imsic_state->vsfile_lock, flags);
> +
> + /*
> + * We don't support SW interrupt files at the moment. Bail out before
> + * anything is touched, as the old file has no owning pCPU in that case
> + * and there is nothing to retarget the producers away from.
> + */
> + if ( old_vsfile_cpu == NR_CPUS )
> + panic("IMSIC SW-file isn't supported\n");
> +
> /*
> * At this point, all interrupt producers are still using the old IMSIC
> + * VS-file so we first move all interrupt producers to the new IMSIC
> * VS-file.
> */
>
> @@ -870,5 +935,43 @@ void imsic_migrate_vcpu(struct vcpu *v)
> /* Zero-out new IMSIC VS-file */
> imsic_call_on_cpu(new_vsfile_cpu, imsic_vsfile_local_clear,
> &vsfile_data);
> + /* Update G-stage mapping for the new IMSIC VS-file */
> + if ( imsic_map_guest_file(v, new_vsfile_hgei) )
> + {
> + domain_crash(v->domain, "Migration to hw interrupt file failed\n");
> +
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + imsic_update_state(v, new_vsfile_hgei);
> +
This gets rewritten later in the series by "xen/riscv: introduce IMSIC h/w
interrupt file attaching to vcpu", which moves the clear/map/update sequence
into imsic_vsfile_acquire() (and adds vgein_release() on the error path).
Could imsic_vsfile_acquire() be introduced here (or in a prep patch) instead,
so that the later patch only adds imsic_vsfile_attach()? That would avoid the
churn.
--
Baptiste Le Duc <baptiste.le-duc@xxxxxxxxxx>
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |