|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v9 2/6] arm/irq: Migrate IRQs during CPU up/down operations
Hi Mykyta,
Mykyta Poturai <Mykyta_Poturai@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> Move IRQs from dying CPU to the online ones when a CPU is getting
> offlined. When onlining, rebalance all IRQs in a round-robin fashion.
> Guest-bound IRQs are already handled by scheduler in the process of
> moving vCPUs to active pCPUs, so we only need to handle IRQs used by Xen
> itself.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mykyta Poturai <mykyta_poturai@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v8->v9:
> * replace CONFIG_CPU_HOTPLUG with CONFIG_CPU_ONLINE_OFFLINE
>
> v7->v8:
> * check only existings ESPIs
>
> v6->v7:
> * replace ifdef with IS_ENABLED
>
> v5->v6:
> * don't do any balancing on boot
> * only do balancing when cpu hotplug is enabled
>
> v4->v5:
> * handle CPU onlining as well
> * more comments
> * fix crash when ESPI is disabled
> * don't assume CPU 0 is a boot CPU
> * use insigned int for irq number
> * remove assumption that all irqs a bound to CPU 0 by default from the
> commit message
>
> v3->v4:
> * patch introduced
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/include/asm/irq.h | 6 ++++
> xen/arch/arm/irq.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> xen/arch/arm/smpboot.c | 7 ++++
> 3 files changed, 73 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/irq.h b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/irq.h
> index 09788dbfeb..d043360135 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/irq.h
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/irq.h
> @@ -126,6 +126,12 @@ bool irq_type_set_by_domain(const struct domain *d);
> void irq_end_none(struct irq_desc *irq);
> #define irq_end_none irq_end_none
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_ONLINE_OFFLINE
> +void rebalance_irqs(unsigned int from, bool up);
> +#else
> +static inline void rebalance_irqs(unsigned int from, bool up) {}
> +#endif
> +
> #endif /* _ASM_HW_IRQ_H */
> /*
> * Local variables:
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/irq.c b/xen/arch/arm/irq.c
> index 7204bc2b68..6445183f5c 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/irq.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/irq.c
> @@ -158,6 +158,61 @@ static int init_local_irq_data(unsigned int cpu)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_ONLINE_OFFLINE
> +static int cpu_next;
> +
> +static void balance_irq(int irq, unsigned int from, bool up)
> +{
> + struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + ASSERT(!cpumask_empty(&cpu_online_map));
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
> + if ( likely(!desc->action) )
> + goto out;
> +
> + if ( likely(test_bit(_IRQ_GUEST, &desc->status) ||
> + test_bit(_IRQ_MOVE_PENDING, &desc->status)) )
> + goto out;
> +
> + /*
> + * Setting affinity to a mask of multiple CPUs causes the GIC drivers to
> + * select one CPU from that mask. If the dying CPU was included in the
> IRQ's
> + * affinity mask, we cannot determine exactly which CPU the interrupt is
> + * currently routed to, as GIC drivers lack a concrete get_affinity API.
> So
> + * to be safe we must reroute it to a new, definitely online, CPU. In the
> + * case of CPU going down, we move only the interrupt that could reside
> on
> + * it. Otherwise, we rearrange all interrupts in a round-robin fashion.
> + */
> + if ( !up && !cpumask_test_cpu(from, desc->affinity) )
> + goto out;
> +
> + cpu_next = cpumask_cycle(cpu_next, &cpu_online_map);
> + irq_set_affinity(desc, cpumask_of(cpu_next));
> +
> +out:
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +void rebalance_irqs(unsigned int from, bool up)
> +{
> + int irq;
> +
> + if ( cpumask_empty(&cpu_online_map) )
> + return;
> +
> + for ( irq = NR_LOCAL_IRQS; irq < NR_IRQS; irq++ )
> + balance_irq(irq, from, up);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_GICV3_ESPI
> + for ( irq = ESPI_BASE_INTID; irq < ESPI_BASE_INTID + gic_number_espis();
> + irq++ )
> + balance_irq(irq, from, up);
> +#endif
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_CPU_ONLINE_OFFLINE */
> +
> static int cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb, unsigned long action,
> void *hcpu)
> {
> @@ -172,6 +227,11 @@ static int cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
> unsigned long action,
> printk(XENLOG_ERR "Unable to allocate local IRQ for CPU%u\n",
> cpu);
> break;
> + case CPU_ONLINE:
> + if ( IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_ONLINE_OFFLINE) &&
> + system_state >= SYS_STATE_active )
> + rebalance_irqs(cpu, true);
> + break;
> }
>
> return notifier_from_errno(rc);
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/smpboot.c b/xen/arch/arm/smpboot.c
> index 1806c47a08..239d4a7a25 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/smpboot.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/smpboot.c
> @@ -433,6 +433,13 @@ void __cpu_disable(void)
>
> smp_mb();
>
> + /*
> + * Now that the interrupts are cleared and the CPU marked as offline,
> + * move interrupts out of it
> + */
You are using CPU notifier for "up" path, but calling rebalance_irqs()
directly in "down" path. Is there a particular reason for this? Cursory
check of set_affinity() does not show need for alive CPU, unless I am
missing something of course.
> + if ( IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_ONLINE_OFFLINE) )
> + rebalance_irqs(cpu, false);
> +
> /* Return to caller; eventually the IPI mechanism will unwind and the
> * scheduler will drop to the idle loop, which will call stop_cpu(). */
> }
--
WBR, Volodymyr
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |