|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v4] xen/arm: smmuv3: Add support for removing devices
On 25-Aug-26 09:39, Mykyta Poturai wrote: > Allow for removing devices from SMMUv3. arm_smmu_deassign_dev handles > most of the work by disabling ATS and zeroing STEs. Additionally, unset > the dt_device_is_protected flag and free no longer needed smmu_master. > Free iommu_fwspec for PCI devices only, for DT devices it is handled by > generic IOMMU layer. > > Rework dt_device_set_protected to accept a boolean parameter, update > callsites. > > Signed-off-by: Mykyta Poturai <mykyta_poturai@xxxxxxxx> > --- > > Tested on QEMU with SRIOV series[1] by repeatedly enabling/disabling > VFs. > > [1]: https://patchew.org/Xen/cover.1772806036.git.mykyta._5Fpoturai@xxxxxxxx/ > > V3->V4: > * s/u8/uint8_t/ > * assert pcidevs_locked > * assert deassignment is only reachable by PCI > * fix build error with HAS_PCI=n > > V2->V3: > * free fwspec for pci devices > * remove testing note from commit message > > V1->V2: > * check for phantom functions > * simplify pci/dt device split > * improve error handling > * don't try to free master for unprotected devices > * rework dt_device_set_protected > --- > xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/ipmmu-vmsa.c | 2 +- > xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu-v3.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++- > xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu.c | 4 +- > xen/include/xen/device_tree.h | 5 +- > 4 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/ipmmu-vmsa.c > b/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/ipmmu-vmsa.c > index fa9ab9cb13..0648f9b407 100644 > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/ipmmu-vmsa.c > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/ipmmu-vmsa.c > @@ -1367,7 +1367,7 @@ static int ipmmu_add_device(u8 devfn, struct device > *dev) > } > > /* Let Xen know that the master device is protected by an IOMMU. */ > - dt_device_set_protected(dev_to_dt(dev)); > + dt_device_set_protected(dev_to_dt(dev), true); > } > #ifdef CONFIG_HAS_PCI > if ( dev_is_pci(dev) ) > diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu-v3.c > b/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu-v3.c > index bf153227db..3578f36259 100644 > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu-v3.c > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/smmu-v3.c > @@ -1493,6 +1493,80 @@ static int arm_smmu_assign_dev(struct domain *d, u8 > devfn, struct device *dev, > static int arm_smmu_deassign_dev(struct domain *d, uint8_t devfn, > struct device *dev); > > +static int arm_smmu_remove_device(uint8_t devfn, struct device *dev) > +{ > + struct arm_smmu_master *master; > + struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec; > + struct domain *d = NULL; > + > + fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev); > + if ( !fwspec ) > + return -ENODEV; > + > + master = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev); > + if ( !master ) > + return -ENODEV; > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_PCI > + if ( dev_is_pci(dev) ) > + { > + struct pci_dev *pdev = dev_to_pci(dev); > + > + /* Ignore calls for phantom functions */ > + if ( devfn != pdev->devfn ) > + return 0; > + > + ASSERT(pcidevs_locked()); > + > + d = pdev->domain; > + } > + else > +#endif > + { > + if ( !dt_device_is_protected(dev_to_dt(dev)) ) > + { > + dev_err(dev, "Not added to SMMUv3\n"); > + return -ENODEV; > + } > + > + dt_device_set_protected(dev_to_dt(dev), false); > + if ( master->domain && master->domain->d ) > + d = master->domain->d; Given the comment below and `ASSERT(dev_is_pci(dev))`, `d` can never be != NULL in DT case, so these two lines can be dropped. > + } > + > + if ( d ) > + { > + int ret; > + > + /* > + * For DT devices, iommu_remove_dt_device() returns -EBUSY if > the > + * device is still assigned, so d is always NULL on the DT path. > + */ > + ASSERT(dev_is_pci(dev)); > + > + ret = arm_smmu_deassign_dev(d, devfn, dev); > + /* This should never fail because we already checked the domain > */ > + ASSERT(!ret); You checked the domain but the assignment takes place before `arm_smmu_attach_dev()` can fail in .assign_device, so I think it's still possible and the ASSERT should be dropped. > + } > + > + arm_smmu_disable_pasid(master); > + > + dev_info(dev, "Removed master device (SMMUv3 %s StreamIds %u)\n", > + dev_name(fwspec->iommu_dev), fwspec->num_ids); > + > + xfree(master); > + dev_iommu_priv_set(dev, NULL); > + > + /* > + * For DT devices the fwspec is freed by iommu subsystem, but for PCI > + * devices we need to free it here > + */ > + if ( IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_PCI) && dev_is_pci(dev) ) No need for IS_ENABLED here. > + iommu_fwspec_free(dev); Spaces but should be tabs. ~Michal
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |