[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 04/12] x86: add noreturn in a few more places


  • To: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 10:10:38 +0200
  • Authentication-results: eu.smtp.expurgate.cloud; dkim=pass header.s=google header.d=suse.com header.i="@suse.com" header.h="Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:Autocrypt:From:Content-Language:References:Cc:To:Subject:User-Agent:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID"
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Teddy Astie <teddy.astie@xxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 01 Sep 2026 08:10:44 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 29.08.2026 15:21, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
> On 2026-08-28 09:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> start_secondary(), do_double_fault(), play_dead(), and tboot_s3_error()
>> never return, so would better be annotated anyway. The 
>> do_double_fault()
>> change needs accompanying by adjustments to entry_from_{pv,xen}(), as
>> Eclair then deems the "return" there as unreachable.
>>
>> context_switch() and continue_running() are odd: We can't
>> (unconditionally) add noreturn to their declarations, as Arm's variants 
>> do
>> return. Put the attribute on x86'es definitions instead (the use of
>> unreachable() in reset_stack_and_call_ind() allows the compiler to 
>> figure
>> that out itself, but Eclair wants the annotation in addition).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks, yet Andrew's objection will need dealing with.

>> ---
>> entry_from_pv() wants the annotation only when PV=n, yet once added gcc
>> then warns about "return" being used in a "noreturn" function. Is there
>> any other approach to address this besides adding #ifdef inside the
>> function (i.e. replacing the !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PV) check that's 
>> there)?
> 
> Besides GCC's warning, this would violate MISRA C's Rule 17.9 ("A 
> function declared with a _Noreturn function specifier shall not return 
> to its caller")
> which is not (yet) adopted by Xen, as it comes with MISRA C:2012 
> Amendment 3, whereas as you know Xen is based on MISRA C:2012 Amendment 
> 2 rules.
> Besides this, perhaps an alternative could be something like this 
> (untested):
> 
> #define __noreturn_0
> #define __noreturn_1 __attribute__((noreturn))
> 
> #define __noreturn_select(x) __noreturn_select_(x)
> #define __noreturn_select_(x) __noreturn_ ## x
> 
> #define noreturn(cond) __noreturn_select(cond)
> 
> assuming use sites such as noreturn(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FOO))

But how is

void asmlinkage noreturn(!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PV))
entry_from_pv(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)

(besides of course not being correct to use this way) different from

void asmlinkage
#ifndef CONFIG_PV
noreturn
#endif
entry_from_pv(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)

? We'd still end up with a "noreturn" function having "return" statements.

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.