|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] RISC-V: place .sdata / .srodata / .riscv.attributes
On 8/26/26 2:04 PM, Jan Beulich wrote: Of the short-data sections, only .sbss is presently mentioned in the linker script. Place them next to, but ahead of their "normal" data sections. .riscv.attributes can go towards the tail of the image, next to (ahead of) debug info. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> --- Seeing where .sbss lives, does positioning really not matter at all? I would have expected that short-data sections want to live close together, and specifically close to .text / .init.text (seeing that such data is accessed using AUIPC). I'm puzzled that the psABI doesn't even mention them, hence leaving it open how exactly they are to be used. It doesn't, and the reason is that the relevant proximity isn't to .text but to __global_pointer$. The small-data sections exist to let a linker script cluster small objects around that anchor so that ld's relaxation pass can fold an auipc+load pair into a single gp-relative access (-+2 KiB window). That pass is keyed purely on the symbol being defined riscv_global_pointer_value() returns 0 otherwise and the relaxation is skipped. We define no __global_pointer$ and head.S never loads gp (it appears only as a cpu_user_regs slot in entry.S), so every access stays the medany auipc form regardless of section. I confirmed this by linking the same object twice (look at the script below, with and without the symbol: without it, zero gp-relative accesses; with it, the pairs collapse. Worth noting the relaxation is section-agnostic: in the test mentioned below a 400-byte array in plain .bss got gp-relative too, purely because it landed in range. So the sections are a clustering hint, not a mechanism ld keys off.
The script I used:
```
mkdir -p /tmp/gp-demo && cd /tmp/gp-demo
# 1. Test code: one small variable (-> .sbss) and one large array (-> .bss)
cat > s.c <<'EOF'
int small_var; /* 4 bytes -> .sbss */
int big_arr[100]; /* 400 bytes -> .bss */
int read_small(void) { return small_var; }
int read_big(void) { return big_arr[0]; }
EOF
# 2. Linker script WITHOUT __global_pointer$
cat > nogp.lds <<'EOF'
ENTRY(read_small)
SECTIONS {
. = 0xffffffffc0000000;
.text : { *(.text) *(.text.*) }
.data : { *(.sdata .sdata.*) *(.data .data.*) }
.bss : { *(.sbss .sbss.*) *(.bss .bss.*) *(COMMON) }
/DISCARD/ : { *(.comment) *(.note*) *(.riscv.attributes) }
}
EOF
# 3. Same script, but WITH __global_pointer$ defined
sed 's|^ \.data : {| __global_pointer$ = . + 0x800;\n .data : {|'
nogp.lds > gp.lds
riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc -O2 -march=rv64ima -mabi=lp64 -mcmodel=medany \
-ffreestanding -c s.c -o s.o
# Check the INPUT sections: .sbss vs plain .bss (the link merges them, so
# inspect s.o, not the linked ELF)
echo "### INPUT sections the symbols live in ###"
riscv64-linux-gnu-objdump -t s.o | grep -E 'small_var|big_arr'
# Link both ways and compare the generated code
for L in nogp gp; do
riscv64-linux-gnu-ld -T $L.lds s.o -o $L.elf 2>/dev/null
echo "=============== $L.lds ==============="
riscv64-linux-gnu-objdump -d --no-show-raw-insn $L.elf \
| sed -n '/<read_small>:/,/ret/p;/<read_big>:/,/ret/p'
done
```
What remains to eliminate orphan section warnings is the placement of .note.GNU-stack (which perhaps wants dealing with on all of Arm, PPC, and RISC-V together, ideally unifying with x86) and (odd at the first glance, but dealt with on x86 as well, i.e. may again want unifying) that of a number of .rela.* sections. --- a/xen/arch/riscv/xen.lds.S +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/xen.lds.S @@ -44,6 +44,8 @@ SECTIONSBUGFRAMES + *(.srodata) Nit: .riscv.attributes is SHT_RISCV_ATTRIBUTES, i.e. non-alloc.:text on it is misleading, and without an explicit address it gets sh_addr from .(location counter) after .dtb. Could we use matching the idiom used for every other non-alloc section in xen.lds.h:
.riscv.attributes 0 : { *(.riscv.attributes) }
No functional difference either way (objcopy -O binary drops it, and I
verified a non-alloc output section doesn't advance dot, so nothing
downstream shifts), so purely consistency.
Is dropping orphan-handling-y := from arch/riscv/Makefile the intended end of this series? As if I understand correctly with such defintion we will miss warning so everything of that will be missed: cd xenriscv64-linux-gnu-ld -T arch/riscv/xen.lds prelink.o --orphan-handling=warn -o /tmp/t.elf 2>&1 \ | grep 'orphan section'/usr/bin/riscv64-linux-gnu-ld: warning: orphan section `.note.GNU-stack' from `prelink.o' being placed in section `.note.GNU-stack' /usr/bin/riscv64-linux-gnu-ld: warning: orphan section `.rela.text' from `prelink.o' being placed in section `.rela.dyn' /usr/bin/riscv64-linux-gnu-ld: warning: orphan section `.rela.init.text' from `prelink.o' being placed in section `.rela.dyn' /usr/bin/riscv64-linux-gnu-ld: warning: orphan section `.rela.data.read_mostly' from `prelink.o' being placed in section `.rela.dyn' /usr/bin/riscv64-linux-gnu-ld: warning: orphan section `.rela.init.data' from `prelink.o' being placed in section `.rela.dyn' /usr/bin/riscv64-linux-gnu-ld: warning: orphan section `.rela.text.header' from `prelink.o' being placed in section `.rela.dyn' Thanks. ~ Oleksii
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |