Re: [PATCH 2/4] stubdom: remove pciutils

[Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jan Beulich, le mar. 18 août 2026 08:03:51 +0200, a ecrit:
> On 17.08.2026 18:37, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Juergen Gross, le lun. 17 août 2026 10:24:02 +0200, a ecrit:
> >> On 17.08.26 09:48, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >>> Juergen Gross, le lun. 17 août 2026 09:18:41 +0200, a ecrit:
> >>>> There is no user of libpci left in stubdoms.
> >>>>
> >>>> Remove libpci from the stubdom build system.
> >>>
> >>> Wouldn't it be useful to keep this for anybody who would want to drive a
> >>> PCI card from a stubdomain?
> >>>
> >>> I mean, in the zlib case, it's really a mere question of build & link,
> >>> so we don't need to ship it, people can do it themselves easily like for
> >>> any other library.
> >>>
> >>> But here there is actual porting work, that we'd better not lose but
> >>> keep shipping.
> >>
> >> This is all still available via git.
> > 
> > No, it is not really.
> 
> Question is - does this matter in the first place? If someone wanted to
> drive e.g. a USB device, would we include USB code?

Why not? I mean, better centralize the maintenance of such code instead
of possibly several people having to maintain their own USB layer each.

> I'm with Jürgen that we should have in the upstream tree only what is
> also used in-tree.

But then there's probably quite a few things that could be dropped
from mini-os because the mini-os and xen trees don't use them, e.g.
the fbfront. But is that really a service to make to people using this
infrastructure, or planning to?

Samuel