[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 17/18] pci: Drop parse_pci_split{_seg}()


  • To: Teddy Astie <teddy.astie@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:49:19 +0200
  • Authentication-results: eu.smtp.expurgate.cloud; dkim=pass header.s=google header.d=suse.com header.i="@suse.com" header.h="Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To:Autocrypt:From:Content-Language:References:Cc:To:Subject:User-Agent:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID"
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 14:49:33 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 29.06.2026 19:21, Teddy Astie wrote:
> No user of these functions remain, collapse all the logic into the
> recently introduced pci_sbdf_t variants.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Teddy Astie <teddy.astie@xxxxxxxxxx>

In order to see whether the style issues introduced in patch 08 actually help
here keeping the diff small, I looked at this patch first. Hence a question
and a few nits here right away:

> --- a/xen/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -151,18 +151,7 @@ void pci_intx(const struct pci_dev *pdev, bool enable)
>      pci_conf_write16(pdev->sbdf, PCI_COMMAND, cmd);
>  }
>  
> -const char *__init parse_pci_split(const char *s, unsigned int *seg_p,
> -                             unsigned int *bus_p, unsigned int *dev_p,
> -                             unsigned int *func_p)
> -{
> -    bool def_seg;
> -
> -    return parse_pci_seg(s, seg_p, bus_p, dev_p, func_p, &def_seg);
> -}
> -
> -const char *__init parse_pci_split_seg(const char *s, unsigned int *seg_p,
> -                                 unsigned int *bus_p, unsigned int *dev_p,
> -                                 unsigned int *func_p, bool *def_seg)
> +const char *__init parse_pci_seg(const char *s, pci_sbdf_t *sbdf, bool 
> *def_seg)
>  {
>      unsigned long seg = simple_strtoul(s, &s, 16), bus, dev, func = 0;
>  
> @@ -180,39 +169,21 @@ const char *__init parse_pci_split_seg(const char *s, 
> unsigned int *seg_p,
>          *def_seg = true;
>      }
>  
> -    if ( func_p && *s == '.' )
> +    if ( *s == '.' )
>          func = simple_strtoul(s + 1, &s, 0);

And the function part being optional goes away entirely silently?

> -    if ( seg != (seg_p ? (u16)seg : 0) ||
> +    if ( seg != (u16)seg ||

Nit: uint16_t please when you touch this line anyway.

>           bus != PCI_BUS(PCI_BDF(bus, 0)) ||
>           dev != PCI_SLOT(PCI_DEVFN(dev, 0)) ||
>           func != PCI_FUNC(PCI_DEVFN(0, func)) )
>          return NULL;
>  
> -    if ( seg_p )
> -        *seg_p = seg;
> -    *bus_p = bus;
> -    *dev_p = dev;
> -    if ( func_p )
> -        *func_p = func;
> -
> -    return s;
> -}
> -
> -const char *__init parse_pci_sbdf(const char *s, pci_sbdf_t *sbdf)
> -{
> -    unsigned int seg, bus, dev, func;
> -    const char *out = parse_pci(s, &seg, &bus, &dev, &func);
> -
>      *sbdf = PCI_SBDF(seg, bus, dev, func);
> -    return out;
> +    return s;
>  }

Nit: Blank line please ahead of a function's main "return", and ...

> -const char *__init parse_pci_sbdf_seg(const char *s, pci_sbdf_t *sbdf, bool 
> *def_seg)
> +const char *__init parse_pci(const char *s, pci_sbdf_t *sbdf)
>  {
> -    unsigned int seg, bus, dev, func;
> -    const char *out = parse_pci_seg(s, &seg, &bus, &dev, &func, def_seg);
> -
> -    *sbdf = PCI_SBDF(seg, bus, dev, func);
> -    return out;
> +    bool def_seg;
> +    return parse_pci_seg(s, sbdf, &def_seg);
>  }

... more generally between declartion(s) and statement(s).

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.