[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] x86: kexec is PV-only
- To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- From: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 15:39:11 +0200
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=citrix.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=citrix.com; dkim=pass header.d=citrix.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector10001; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=Met4QhsbXv3thN0cscjnql2ajHPodLBp8dzJxRqHbYs=; b=V5yWjlvRSa0rEpMd7OsEb0rNce7/TSojj27WFjyxGKs5uFQCKEBZ1IZgwO75XBdM4OPhHEYYkiEm9q7IgkVNqrBq5m1AiJdlMvReFst9VdAz2GQLGxiV/xCFo6l31Ri+ozqhr9Vw0elIi5lJJZAtnnK1Oh0/n/ttTOSqJMopxj2fV1hENryqyDH3p1syhx45A1n8JC3IfZNvVw32TWsUmEOqYzlAKL/GxX4NlEkWRr/8PmtvI9omUMzACKcTPJ0PlIK2deHjRLH+zRcMkKMgO6VF5ky89vNBmhA0fM8hofdJWE2VH0Ce5gRn6d4NchWHWY+ejSebyIkovqAUs53ZUg==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector10001; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Ym6ny/zxb6/H3XncJk3594YeTtIXeZISoVv6aK64xgNaV6FTFtNetksuoSshYzQ5o2Yolubyfd6u7xOxRDF1KEcjmSwmVjvkCdwZaZTu0SSLAwPVZw8oIP2EEQC3pj09aPUByMGgs0X9Cq8dDAVMEMXKraBpgecLjgXncg433oijcZa1+d+wJwfjkV7xDUVzWswlG5Ce3bZSb/kMU+JtPqgRDutzoN0urPaT7ohOXpzpBUNrbfQ1cW97v1AA6c2XsDKt2Z+i2LXgEse6DjcwFTb/yJTumxK9hzmNZzs0P/tm+RHUj/zFolEAuI3a17BCJ/RyHybEpi2nD+hXR04G3A==
- Authentication-results: eu.smtp.expurgate.cloud; dkim=pass header.s=selector1 header.d=citrix.com header.i="@citrix.com" header.h="From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck"
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=citrix.com;
- Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Teddy Astie <teddy.astie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 13:39:25 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On Tue, Jun 30, 2026 at 03:35:12PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Kexec is of no use without its hypercall, and that hypercall is wired up
> only for PV. Allowing that code to be built when !PV therefore results in
> a lot of unreachable code, violating Misra C:2012 rule 2.1.
Do you know what's missing for the hypercall to be functional on HVM
environments? We would need that for parity between PVH and PV dom0s.
Thanks, Roger.
|
