[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] pv32: Fix bogus cr2 on fault in emulation gate


  • To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 09:00:36 +0200
  • Authentication-results: eu.smtp.expurgate.cloud; dkim=pass header.s=google header.d=suse.com header.i="@suse.com" header.h="Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To:Autocrypt:Content-Language:References:Cc:To:From:Subject:User-Agent:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID"
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Teddy Astie <teddy.astie@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 21 May 2026 07:02:47 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 21.05.2026 08:33, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 20.05.2026 19:21, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 20/05/2026 5:48 pm, Teddy Astie wrote:
>>> Le 20/05/2026 à 18:34, Andrew Cooper a écrit :
>>>> On 20/05/2026 4:51 pm, Teddy Astie wrote:
>>>>> __{put,get}_guest returns -EFAULT on access faults which causes
>>>>> the injected cr2 to be off by 14 bytes (as EFAULT is 14) which is
>>>>> incorrect.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fix the computation by relying on copy_{from,to}_guest_pv which
>>>>> reports the number of remaining bytes instead of a negative errno,
>>>>> such that we can compute the offset properly.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 70ad570b2799 ("x86/64: paravirt 32-on-64 call gate support")
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Teddy Astie <teddy.astie@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>   xen/arch/x86/pv/emul-gate-op.c | 5 +++--
>>>>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/pv/emul-gate-op.c
>>>>> b/xen/arch/x86/pv/emul-gate-op.c
>>>>> index c2c699fbff..cacc171115 100644
>>>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/pv/emul-gate-op.c
>>>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/pv/emul-gate-op.c
>>>>> @@ -289,9 +289,10 @@ void pv_emulate_gate_op(struct cpu_user_regs
>>>>> *regs)
>>>>>           int rc;
>>>>>   #define push(item) do \
>>>>>           { \
>>>>> +            unsigned int __value = item; \
>>>>>               --stkp; \
>>>>>               esp -= 4; \
>>>>> -            rc = __put_guest(item, stkp); \
>>>>> +            rc = copy_to_guest_pv(stkp, &__value, sizeof(__value)); \
>>>>
>>>> Oh, this probably violates MISRA, but you don't need to use a separate
>>>> variable because sizeof() has no side effects.
>>>>
>>>> Given that the expression is now &item, I think it needs to be &(item).
>>>>
>>>
>>> I tried something like that, but it looked a bit weird and clang
>>> wasn't happy (at least in language server) because of the &(x + y).
>>>
>>> We also need to ensure that we're actually copying 32-bits scalars
>>> (and not 16-bits or 64-bits ones) like the previous behavior.
>>>
>>> That diff seems to work though
>>>
>>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/pv/emul-gate-op.c
>>> b/xen/arch/x86/pv/emul-gate-op.c
>>> index cacc171115..b72a3058dd 100644
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/pv/emul-gate-op.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/pv/emul-gate-op.c
>>> @@ -289,10 +289,9 @@ void pv_emulate_gate_op(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
>>>          int rc;
>>>  #define push(item) do \
>>>          { \
>>> -            unsigned int __value = item; \
>>>              --stkp; \
>>>              esp -= 4; \
>>> -            rc = copy_to_guest_pv(stkp, &__value, sizeof(__value)); \
>>> +            rc = copy_to_guest_pv(stkp, &(uint32_t)(item),
>>> sizeof(uint32_t)); \
>>>              if ( rc ) \
>>>              { \
>>>                  pv_inject_page_fault(PFEC_write_access, \ 
>>
>> Oh, that's a second bug you're fixing then.
>>
>> Pushes of ss/cs need to be done with 4-byte writes and zero extended.
> 
> And they are: Access size is derived from the pointer passed, not from the
> item.

Oh, while access size has always been correct, ....

>> I've added:
>>
>> The use of a local variable in push() also fixes a second bug.  On all
>> but the earliest 32bit CPUs, segment selectors pushes are
>> zero-extended 32bit stores.  Xen was not doing this for %ss and %cs.

... zero-extension was lost with the FRED work, so a 2nd Fixes: tag is
going to be necessary: cb29eed2dae7 ("x86/traps: Extend struct
cpu_user_regs/cpu_info with FRED fields").

Jan

>> to the commit message.
>>
>> ~Andrew
> 




 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.