[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Problem with PCI-passthrough to PV guest


  • To: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jürgen Groß <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 5 May 2026 17:53:31 +0200
  • Authentication-results: eu.smtp.expurgate.cloud; dkim=pass header.s=google header.d=suse.com header.i="@suse.com" header.h="Autocrypt:Subject:From:To:Content-Language:User-Agent:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID"
  • Autocrypt: addr=jgross@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsBNBFOMcBYBCACgGjqjoGvbEouQZw/ToiBg9W98AlM2QHV+iNHsEs7kxWhKMjrioyspZKOB ycWxw3ie3j9uvg9EOB3aN4xiTv4qbnGiTr3oJhkB1gsb6ToJQZ8uxGq2kaV2KL9650I1SJve dYm8Of8Zd621lSmoKOwlNClALZNew72NjJLEzTalU1OdT7/i1TXkH09XSSI8mEQ/ouNcMvIJ NwQpd369y9bfIhWUiVXEK7MlRgUG6MvIj6Y3Am/BBLUVbDa4+gmzDC9ezlZkTZG2t14zWPvx XP3FAp2pkW0xqG7/377qptDmrk42GlSKN4z76ELnLxussxc7I2hx18NUcbP8+uty4bMxABEB AAHNH0p1ZXJnZW4gR3Jvc3MgPGpncm9zc0BzdXNlLmNvbT7CwHkEEwECACMFAlOMcK8CGwMH CwkIBwMCAQYVCAIJCgsEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRCw3p3WKL8TL8eZB/9G0juS/kDY9LhEXseh mE9U+iA1VsLhgDqVbsOtZ/S14LRFHczNd/Lqkn7souCSoyWsBs3/wO+OjPvxf7m+Ef+sMtr0 G5lCWEWa9wa0IXx5HRPW/ScL+e4AVUbL7rurYMfwCzco+7TfjhMEOkC+va5gzi1KrErgNRHH kg3PhlnRY0Udyqx++UYkAsN4TQuEhNN32MvN0Np3WlBJOgKcuXpIElmMM5f1BBzJSKBkW0Jc Wy3h2Wy912vHKpPV/Xv7ZwVJ27v7KcuZcErtptDevAljxJtE7aJG6WiBzm+v9EswyWxwMCIO RoVBYuiocc51872tRGywc03xaQydB+9R7BHPzsBNBFOMcBYBCADLMfoA44MwGOB9YT1V4KCy vAfd7E0BTfaAurbG+Olacciz3yd09QOmejFZC6AnoykydyvTFLAWYcSCdISMr88COmmCbJzn sHAogjexXiif6ANUUlHpjxlHCCcELmZUzomNDnEOTxZFeWMTFF9Rf2k2F0Tl4E5kmsNGgtSa aMO0rNZoOEiD/7UfPP3dfh8JCQ1VtUUsQtT1sxos8Eb/HmriJhnaTZ7Hp3jtgTVkV0ybpgFg w6WMaRkrBh17mV0z2ajjmabB7SJxcouSkR0hcpNl4oM74d2/VqoW4BxxxOD1FcNCObCELfIS auZx+XT6s+CE7Qi/c44ibBMR7hyjdzWbABEBAAHCwF8EGAECAAkFAlOMcBYCGwwACgkQsN6d 1ii/Ey9D+Af/WFr3q+bg/8v5tCknCtn92d5lyYTBNt7xgWzDZX8G6/pngzKyWfedArllp0Pn fgIXtMNV+3t8Li1Tg843EXkP7+2+CQ98MB8XvvPLYAfW8nNDV85TyVgWlldNcgdv7nn1Sq8g HwB2BHdIAkYce3hEoDQXt/mKlgEGsLpzJcnLKimtPXQQy9TxUaLBe9PInPd+Ohix0XOlY+Uk QFEx50Ki3rSDl2Zt2tnkNYKUCvTJq7jvOlaPd6d/W0tZqpyy7KVay+K4aMobDsodB3dvEAs6 ScCnh03dDAFgIq5nsB11j3KPKdVoPlfucX2c7kGNH+LUMbzqV6beIENfNexkOfxHfw==
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 05 May 2026 15:53:42 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

SUSE QA is seeing a problem with PCI-passthrough of a SR-IOV to a PV guest
running a 6.4 based kernel, but I can reproduce the problem with upstream
kernel, too.

The guest is configured with "e820_host=1", but the PCI region on the host
isn't marked as "reserved" in the memory map, so it won't be reserved in
the either.

As the guest doesn't have the ACPI table available describing the PCI regions,
/proc/iomem in the guest won't include those regions as used, resulting in
the kernel's resource management to use those areas for potential memory:

 resource: avoiding allocation from e820 entry [mem 0x78edc000-0x79868fff]
 resource: avoiding allocation from e820 entry [mem 0x79d2a000-0x8fffffff]
 resource: remaining [mem 0x0000000090000000-0x00000000ffdfffff] available
 resource: avoiding allocation from e820 entry [mem 0xc7ffc000-0xc7ffcfff]
 resource: remaining [mem 0x0000000090000000-0x00000000c7ffbfff] available

dom0 /proc/iomem:
 ...
 80000000-8fffffff : PCI MMCONFIG 0000 [bus 00-ff]
 90000000-c7ffbfff : PCI Bus 0000:00    ← PCI MMIO window begins here
   90000000-900fffff : PCI Bus 0000:01  ← I350 VFs assigned in this range
   c6000000-c70fffff : PCI Bus 0000:04

dom0 e820 map:
 ...
 Xen: [mem 0x0000000079869000-0x0000000079d29fff] ACPI NVS
 Xen: [mem 0x0000000079d2a000-0x000000008fffffff] reserved
 Xen: [mem 0x00000000c7ffc000-0x00000000c7ffcfff] reserved
 Xen: [mem 0x00000000fbffc000-0x00000000fbffcfff] reserved
 ...

domU /proc/iomem:
 ...
 00100000-78f06fff : System RAM
   01000000-01ffffff : Kernel code
   ...
 90000000-97ffffff : System RAM
 fee00000-fee00fff : Local APIC

domU e820 map:
 ...
 Xen: [mem 0x0000000079869000-0x0000000079d29fff] ACPI NVS
 Xen: [mem 0x0000000079d2a000-0x000000008fffffff] reserved
 Xen: [mem 0x00000000c7ffc000-0x00000000c7ffcfff] reserved
 Xen: [mem 0x00000000fbffc000-0x00000000fbffcfff] reserved
 ...

The VF is showing up near 0x90000
 pci 0000:00:00.4: [8086:1520] type 00 class 0x020000
 pci 0000:00:00.4: reg 0x10: [mem 0x90004000-0x90007fff 64bit pref]
 pci 0000:00:00.4: reg 0x1c: [mem 0x90024000-0x90027fff 64bit pref]
 pcifront pci-0: New device on 0000:00:00.4 found.
 pcifront pci-0: claiming resource 0000:00:00.4/0
pci 0000:00:00.4: can't claim BAR 0 [mem 0x90004000-0x90007fff 64bit pref]: address conflict with System RAM [mem 0x90000000-0x97ffffff] pcifront pci-0: Could not claim resource 0000:00:00.4/0! Device offline. Try using e820_host=1 in the guest config.
 pcifront pci-0: claiming resource 0000:00:00.4/3
pci 0000:00:00.4: can't claim BAR 3 [mem 0x90024000-0x90027fff 64bit pref]: address conflict with System RAM [mem 0x90000000-0x97ffffff] pcifront pci-0: Could not claim resource 0000:00:00.4/3! Device offline. Try using e820_host=1 in the guest config.

My first idea for solving this was to add the PCI regions from dom0's
/proc/iomem to the e820 map of the guest, but this is more a hack than a sane
solution.

Thoughts?


Juergen

Attachment: OpenPGP_0xB0DE9DD628BF132F.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.