[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 9/9] x86/mwait-idle: Add C-states validation


  • To: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 4 May 2026 11:34:40 +0200
  • Authentication-results: eu.smtp.expurgate.cloud; dkim=pass header.s=google header.d=suse.com header.i="@suse.com" header.h="Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To:Autocrypt:From:Content-Language:References:Cc:To:Subject:User-Agent:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID"
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 04 May 2026 09:34:35 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 24.04.2026 21:15, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 05:58:21PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> @@ -1589,6 +1594,41 @@ static char *__init get_cmdline_field(ch
>>  }
>>  
>>  /**
>> + * validate_cmdline_cstate - Validate a C-state from cmdline.
>> + * @state: The C-state to validate.
>> + * @prev_state: The previous C-state in the table or NULL.
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 if the C-state is valid or -EINVAL otherwise.
> 
> Hm, I know we picked this up from upstream, but this function would
> better return a boolean, rather than 0 or -EINVAL.

I agree, but I didn't want to deviate from their code purely for cosmetic
reasons.

>> +static int __init validate_cmdline_cstate(struct cpuidle_state *state,
>> +                                      struct cpuidle_state *prev_state)
>> +{
>> +    if (state->exit_latency == 0)
>> +            /* Exit latency 0 can only be used for the POLL state */
>> +            return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +    if (state->exit_latency > MAX_CMDLINE_LATENCY_US)
>> +            return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +    if (state->target_residency > MAX_CMDLINE_RESIDENCY_US)
>> +            return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +    if (state->target_residency < state->exit_latency)
>> +            return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +    if (!prev_state)
>> +            return 0;
>> +
>> +    if (state->exit_latency <= prev_state->exit_latency)
>> +            return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +    if (state->target_residency <= prev_state->target_residency)
>> +            return -EINVAL;
> 
> I'm not an expert on C-states, but isn't this checking against the
> previous value kind of defeating part of the purpose of the command
> line?

I don't know. The question would need raising to the author.

> Also, it might help to also write down those limits in the command
> line documentation.

What do you mean there? Some of the values are universal, but some
checks are against model-specific values. I don't think you mean to
enumerate them all?

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.