[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v6 1/7] xen/mm: Refactor claim deduction for later functional changes


  • To: Bernhard Kaindl <bernhard.kaindl@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 4 May 2026 07:41:09 +0200
  • Authentication-results: eu.smtp.expurgate.cloud; dkim=pass header.s=google header.d=suse.com header.i="@suse.com" header.h="Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To:Autocrypt:From:Content-Language:References:Cc:To:Subject:User-Agent:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID"
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 04 May 2026 05:41:16 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 22.04.2026 16:35, Bernhard Kaindl wrote:
> 
> Jan Beulich wrote:
> 
>> As to the rename to deduct_global_claims(): With that, wouldn't its 2nd
>> parameter then better also change to "deduction"? Furthermore, "global" in
>> the name is ambiguous: It may mean "not per-node", but it may also mean
>> "not per-domain". The v4 name didn't have such an issue.
> 
> I see the point about 'global'. While the struct domain argument provides
> context, the term is indeed too generic.
> 
> In this logic, 'global' was intended to refer to the opposite of
> node-specific claims. While the legacy codebase uses 'no-node' or
> NUMA_NO_NODE as a sentinel, I find those terms ambiguous for this new
> logic; they often imply a "missing" assignment rather than an explicit
> "any-node" policy.
> 
> 'Node-agnostic' better describes the architectural intent: that these
> claims are valid regardless of node locality. To resolve the ambiguity,
> I will replace 'global' with 'node-agnostic' across the board (design
> documentation, code, and tests).
> 
> Specifically, I will:
> 
>     Rename the function to deduct_node_agnostic_claims().

Or deduct_host_claims() (short for deduct_host_wide_claims())?

Jan

>     Update the second parameter to 'deduction' for consistency.
> 
>     Update the function comment to explicitly define the scope.
> 
> /* Deduct from the domain's node-agnostic (non-per-node) claims pool */
> static unsigned long deduct_node_agnostic_claims(struct domain *d,
>                                                  unsigned long deduction)
> 
> While 'global' was shorter, 'node-agnostic' is much more descriptive of
> the actual logic and the node-locality (or lack thereof) being addressed,
> avoiding the potential confusion associated with 'no-node'.
> 
> For consistency, the corresponding renames across the series will be:
> 
> +--------------------------------+---------------------------------------+
> | Original Term                  | New Term                              |
> +--------------------------------+---------------------------------------+
> | "global claims"                | "node-agnostic claims"                |
> | d->global_claims               | d->node_agnostic_claims               |
> | XEN_DOMCTL_CLAIM_MEMORY_GLOBAL | XEN_DOMCTL_CLAIM_MEMORY_NODE_AGNOSTIC |
> | deduct_global_claims()         | deduct_node_agnostic_claims()         |
> +--------------------------------+---------------------------------------+
> 
> I believe these changes result in less ambiguous language universally.
> Jan, could you Ack these renames for the next version of the series?
> 
> Bernhard
> 




 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.