[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2] hypfs: add ASSERT_UNREACHABLE() in hypfs_get_entry_rel()


  • To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 4 May 2026 07:17:55 +0200
  • Authentication-results: eu.smtp.expurgate.cloud; dkim=pass header.s=google header.d=suse.com header.i="@suse.com" header.h="Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To:Autocrypt:From:Content-Language:References:Cc:To:Subject:User-Agent:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID"
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, Dmytro Prokopchuk1 <dmytro_prokopchuk1@xxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 04 May 2026 05:17:59 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 29.04.2026 11:44, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 28/04/2026 7:19 pm, Dmytro Prokopchuk1 wrote:
>> The statement 'return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);' on the final line of the
>> function 'hypfs_get_entry_rel()' is unreachable because the logic within
>> the infinite loop 'for (;;)' provides all possible exit paths for the
>> function. So there is no execution path to exit the loop and reach the
>> final that statement.
>>
>> This unreachable code violates MISRA C Rule 2.1 which states: "A project
>> shall not contain unreachable code".
>>
>> To fix that and potential compilers "control reaches end of non-void
>> function" warning, mark the code path as unreachable using macro
>> 'ASSERT_UNREACHABLE()'.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmytro Prokopchuk <dmytro_prokopchuk1@xxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>> - add ASSERT_UNREACHABLE() before the final return statement instead of 
>> removing it
>> Test CI pipeline:
>> https://gitlab.com/xen-project/people/dimaprkp4k/xen/-/pipelines/2485661910
>> Link to v1:
>> https://patchew.org/Xen/341811ced2943fb79d0235c27781c564c7bdaf02.1775749146.git.dmytro._5Fprokopchuk1@xxxxxxxx/
>> ---
>>  xen/common/hypfs.c | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/common/hypfs.c b/xen/common/hypfs.c
>> index cdf4ee0171..02fb234568 100644
>> --- a/xen/common/hypfs.c
>> +++ b/xen/common/hypfs.c
>> @@ -348,6 +348,7 @@ static struct hypfs_entry *hypfs_get_entry_rel(struct 
>> hypfs_entry_dir *dir,
>>          dir = container_of(entry, struct hypfs_entry_dir, e);
>>      }
>>  
>> +    ASSERT_UNREACHABLE();
>>      return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
>>  }
>>  
> 
> No.  This is absurd.

Why?

> Not to mention that you are *definitely* not fixing the stated MISRA rule.

Correct. It is instead deviating that rule for this code instance. I'm pretty
sure we have a few other similar pieces of code elsewhere.

In any event - your reply isn't really actionable. If you want things done
differently, then please make a concrete suggestion. Otherwise, in a couple
of days, I'll commit this with Jürgen's R-b.

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.