|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v9 2/3] of: factor arguments passed to of_map_id() into a struct
On Sun, 01 Mar 2026 08:34:20 +0000,
Vijayanand Jitta <vijayanand.jitta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Charan Teja Kalla <charan.kalla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Change of_map_id() to take a pointer to struct of_phandle_args
> instead of passing target device node and translated IDs separately.
> Update all callers accordingly.
>
> Subsequent patch will make use of the args_count field in
> struct of_phandle_args.
>
> Suggested-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Charan Teja Kalla <charan.kalla@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Vijayanand Jitta <vijayanand.jitta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c | 2 +-
> drivers/of/base.c | 37
> +++++++++++++++++------------------
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 8 +++++++-
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-apple.c | 4 +++-
> drivers/xen/grant-dma-ops.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/of.h | 21 +++++++++++++-------
> 6 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> index a511ecf21fcd..d255d0f58e8c 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ static int of_iommu_configure_dev_id(struct device_node
> *master_np,
> struct of_phandle_args iommu_spec = { .args_count = 1 };
> int err;
>
> - err = of_map_iommu_id(master_np, *id, &iommu_spec.np, iommu_spec.args);
> + err = of_map_iommu_id(master_np, *id, &iommu_spec);
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
> index 57420806c1a2..6c3628255908 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
> @@ -2102,8 +2102,11 @@ int of_find_last_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
> * @id: device ID to map.
> * @map_name: property name of the map to use.
> * @map_mask_name: optional property name of the mask to use.
> - * @target: optional pointer to a target device node.
> - * @id_out: optional pointer to receive the translated ID.
> + * @arg: of_phandle_args structure,
> + * which includes:
> + * np: pointer to the target device node
> + * args_count: number of arguments
Number of arguments *to what*? Isn't that the size of args[] instead?
> + * args[]: array to receive the translated ID(s).
> *
> * Given a device ID, look up the appropriate implementation-defined
> * platform ID and/or the target device which receives transactions on that
> @@ -2117,21 +2120,21 @@ int of_find_last_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
> */
> int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
> const char *map_name, const char *map_mask_name,
> - struct device_node **target, u32 *id_out)
> + struct of_phandle_args *arg)
> {
> u32 map_mask, masked_id;
> int map_len;
> const __be32 *map = NULL;
>
> - if (!np || !map_name || (!target && !id_out))
> + if (!np || !map_name || !arg)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> map = of_get_property(np, map_name, &map_len);
> if (!map) {
> - if (target)
> + if (arg->np)
> return -ENODEV;
> /* Otherwise, no map implies no translation */
> - *id_out = id;
> + arg->args[0] = id;
What if args_count is 0? Given that you place no restriction on the
way this can be called, that'd be entirely legitimate, and you'd
corrupt something you're not supposed to touch.
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -2173,18 +2176,15 @@ int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
> if (!phandle_node)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> - if (target) {
> - if (*target)
> - of_node_put(phandle_node);
> - else
> - *target = phandle_node;
> + if (arg->np)
> + of_node_put(phandle_node);
> + else
> + arg->np = phandle_node;
>
> - if (*target != phandle_node)
> - continue;
> - }
> + if (arg->np != phandle_node)
> + continue;
>
> - if (id_out)
> - *id_out = masked_id - id_base + out_base;
> + arg->args[0] = masked_id - id_base + out_base;
>
> pr_debug("%pOF: %s, using mask %08x, id-base: %08x, out-base:
> %08x, length: %08x, id: %08x -> %08x\n",
> np, map_name, map_mask, id_base, out_base,
> @@ -2193,11 +2193,10 @@ int of_map_id(const struct device_node *np, u32 id,
> }
>
> pr_info("%pOF: no %s translation for id 0x%x on %pOF\n", np, map_name,
> - id, target && *target ? *target : NULL);
> + id, arg->np ? arg->np : NULL);
>
> /* Bypasses translation */
> - if (id_out)
> - *id_out = id;
> + arg->args[0] = id;
> return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_map_id);
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> index bff8289f804a..74fc603b3f84 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> @@ -1139,12 +1139,18 @@ static int imx_pcie_add_lut_by_rid(struct imx_pcie
> *imx_pcie, u32 rid)
> {
> struct device *dev = imx_pcie->pci->dev;
> struct device_node *target;
> + struct of_phandle_args iommu_spec = { .args_count = 1 };
> u32 sid_i, sid_m;
> int err_i, err_m;
> u32 sid = 0;
>
> target = NULL;
> - err_i = of_map_iommu_id(dev->of_node, rid, &target, &sid_i);
> + err_i = of_map_iommu_id(dev->of_node, rid, &iommu_spec);
> + if (!err_i) {
> + target = iommu_spec.np;
> + sid_i = iommu_spec.args[0];
> + }
> +
> if (target) {
> of_node_put(target);
> } else {
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-apple.c
> b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-apple.c
> index a0937b7b3c4d..e1d4b37d200d 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-apple.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-apple.c
> @@ -755,6 +755,7 @@ static int apple_pcie_enable_device(struct
> pci_host_bridge *bridge, struct pci_d
> {
> u32 sid, rid = pci_dev_id(pdev);
> struct apple_pcie_port *port;
> + struct of_phandle_args iommu_spec = { .args_count = 1 };
> int idx, err;
>
> port = apple_pcie_get_port(pdev);
> @@ -764,10 +765,11 @@ static int apple_pcie_enable_device(struct
> pci_host_bridge *bridge, struct pci_d
> dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "added to bus %s, index %d\n",
> pci_name(pdev->bus->self), port->idx);
>
> - err = of_map_iommu_id(port->pcie->dev->of_node, rid, NULL, &sid);
> + err = of_map_iommu_id(port->pcie->dev->of_node, rid, &iommu_spec);
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> + sid = iommu_spec.args[0];
I find this stuff absolutely unreadable. You're fishing the SID in a
random position of a random structure, without any documentation of
how this is supposed to work. This really needs a wrapper that hides
this implementation detail.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |