|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH 2/2] xen/arm: Simplify type handling for SMCCC declarations
On 24/02/2026 2:18 pm, Orzel, Michal wrote:
>
> On 24/02/2026 13:45, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> There's no use creating a typed copy of a macro argument, simply to use it to
>> create a second typed copy. Remove the indirection, halving the number of
>> local variables created in scope.
>>
>> No functional change.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> CC: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> CC: Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>
>> CC: Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx>
>> CC: Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@xxxxxxx>
>> CC: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>
>>
>> This also makes them clearly elliglbe for converstion to auto, where they
>> weren't before (typeof expression not being that of the RHS).
>> ---
>> xen/arch/arm/include/asm/smccc.h | 21 +++++++--------------
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/smccc.h
>> b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/smccc.h
>> index 347c4526d12a..7e90b0b56550 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/smccc.h
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/smccc.h
>> @@ -113,39 +113,32 @@ struct arm_smccc_res {
>> register unsigned long arg0 ASM_REG(0) = (uint32_t)(a0)
>>
>> #define __declare_arg_1(a0, a1, res) \
>> - typeof(a1) __a1 = (a1); \
>> __declare_arg_0(a0, res); \
>> - register typeof(a1) arg1 ASM_REG(1) = __a1
>> + register typeof(a1) arg1 ASM_REG(1) = a1
>>
>> #define __declare_arg_2(a0, a1, a2, res) \
>> - typeof(a1) __a1 = (a1); \
>> __declare_arg_1(a0, a1, res); \
>> - register typeof(a2) arg2 ASM_REG(2) = __a2
>> + register typeof(a2) arg2 ASM_REG(2) = a2
> Here you fix the issue introduced in patch 1/2 :) You drop typeof(a1) and
> replace it with correct typeof(a2).
>
> Provided this patch is rebased on fixed 1/2:
> Reviewed-by: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>
Thanks. Sadly, ECLAIR rejects this change. I need to retain the
brackets around the macro parameter after move, so this kind of
incremental diff:
> @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ struct arm_smccc_res {
>
> #define __declare_arg_1(a0, a1, res) \
> __declare_arg_0(a0, res); \
> - register typeof(a1) arg1 ASM_REG(1) = a1
> + register typeof(a1) arg1 ASM_REG(1) = (a1)
>
> #define __declare_arg_2(a0, a1, a2, res) \
> __declare_arg_1(a0, a1, res); \
~Andrew
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |