|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH 1/2] xen/arm: Simplify SMCCC handling by reusing __declare_arg_$()
On 24/02/2026 2:17 pm, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 24/02/2026 2:14 pm, Orzel, Michal wrote:
>> On 24/02/2026 13:45, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> Now that the type handling is entirely uniform, it's easier to see that
>>> __declare_arg_3() can use __declare_arg_2() and so on, just like the larger
>>> __declare_arg_$()'s already do.
>>>
>>> No functional change.
>> This patch won't build.
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> CC: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> CC: Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>
>>> CC: Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx>
>>> CC: Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@xxxxxxx>
>>> CC: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> xen/arch/arm/include/asm/smccc.h | 15 +++------------
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/smccc.h
>>> b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/smccc.h
>>> index 5b30dd57b69d..347c4526d12a 100644
>>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/smccc.h
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/smccc.h
>>> @@ -114,26 +114,17 @@ struct arm_smccc_res {
>>>
>>> #define __declare_arg_1(a0, a1, res) \
>>> typeof(a1) __a1 = (a1); \
>>> - struct arm_smccc_res *___res = (res); \
>>> - register unsigned long arg0 ASM_REG(0) = (uint32_t)(a0);\
>>> + __declare_arg_0(a0, res); \
>>> register typeof(a1) arg1 ASM_REG(1) = __a1
>>>
>>> #define __declare_arg_2(a0, a1, a2, res) \
>>> typeof(a1) __a1 = (a1); \
>> You should remove this line and ...
>>
>>> - typeof(a2) __a2 = (a2); \
>> keep this line.
>>
>>> - struct arm_smccc_res *___res = (res); \
>>> - register unsigned long arg0 ASM_REG(0) = (uint32_t)(a0);\
>>> - register typeof(a1) arg1 ASM_REG(1) = __a1; \
>>> + __declare_arg_1(a0, a1, res); \
>>> register typeof(a2) arg2 ASM_REG(2) = __a2
>>>
>>> #define __declare_arg_3(a0, a1, a2, a3, res) \
>>> typeof(a1) __a1 = (a1); \
>>> - typeof(a2) __a2 = (a2); \
>> Same here.
> Hmm - it built for me. I'd better figure out why I missed it first.
Ah - a last minute refactor, and I didn't build test on this commit
boundary.
Fixed. Thanks.
~Andrew
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |